Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Seasonal variations of vitamin D and its relation to lipid profile in Iranian children and adults

Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition volume 36, Article number: 21 (2017) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Vitamin D has a multitude of functional properties and acts like a hormone in the body. Its effect on the lipid profile is one of the proposed mechanisms for its relationship with many disorders during its deficiency. But, this relationship is still conflicting and debatable, so this study was conducted to determine the association between serum level of vitamin D and lipid profiles, including serum concentrations of cholesterol, triglyceride (TG), HDL, and LDL in healthy subjects.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 541 volunteers with age of 5–60 years from normal and healthy subjects were selected via random sampling. Demographics and history of daily or weekly sunlight exposures were recorded. Measuring vitamin D was done in two consecutive seasons: winter and summer. Ten milliliters of peripheral venous blood sample was withdrawn after an overnight fasting. Serum levels of 25(OH) D (25, hydroxy vitamin D3) were measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the Confirmatory test was done by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

Results

Mean age in the total mixed population was 30.83 ± 14.02 years. Subjects were 50.5% male and 49.5% female. Mean 25(OH) D in the total population for winter and summer were 45.8 ± 24.26 ng/ml and 55.24 ± 37.47 ng/ml respectively. In the total population, 38.08% were vitamin D deficient. Comparing serum lipid levels in the summer and winter showed a significant difference for cholesterol, LDL, and HDL, but no significant effect was found for TG. Analysis for the comparison of lipid profiles between the two genders in winter showed that there were significant differences in all lipid profiles except for LDL, while such analysis for summer revealed significant difference just for TG. In multivariate analysis, there was a significant mean difference only for LDL in subgroups with vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency. There was no correlation between Vitamin D and lipid profiles.

Conclusions

Vitamin D is different between the two seasons regardless of gender variations. Its status showed some significant relationship with some lipid profiles (cholesterol, LDL, and HDL) during the two seasons. There were different results among winter and summer based on the gender.

Background

Vitamin D acts in the body like a hormone with a multitude of functions. The main source of vitamin D is solar UV radiation, which converts 7-dehydrocholesterol to pro-vitamin D [1]. Dehydrocholesterol is in turn modified to vitamin D (cholecalciferol) given normal skin temperature. There are few natural dietary sources of vitamin D, which can be found in fatty fish like salmon and herring and in cod liver oil [2].

Serum 25(OH) D (25, hydroxy vitamin D3), the recognized biomarker of vitamin D status best reflects the vitamin D status of the body [3]. Vitamin D deficiency can be defined as vitamin D serum levels less than 27.5 ng/ml. Vitamin D deficiency is a common disorder, found in all age groups and in both genders [4]. Several mechanisms may be related to 25(OH) D deficiency and variation in lipid profile, but there is no consensus on the biological plausibility [5, 6].

Worldwide, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency is 50% in the elderly [7], affecting 30 to 50% of the adult US population [8] and 20–30% of the adult European population [9], with increased occurrence in high- and low-latitude countries. In one multi-center osteoporosis study from Iran, the prevalence of mild, moderate, and severe vitamin D deficiency has been estimated at respectively 47.2, 45.7, and 44.2% among women and 54.2, 41.2, and 37.5% among men in a ≤60-year-old population [5, 10].

From results of cross-sectional data used for meta-analysis where the majority of the study results indicated that serum 25(OH) D is directly associated with serum HDL-C and inversely related to TC, LDL, and triglyceride (TG), it is important to highlight that higher serum 25(OH) D is related to a more favorable lipid profile in the pediatric age groups [10].

The relationship between vitamin D status and lipid profile is unclear. Some epidemiological studies suggest an inverse association between circulating levels of 25(OH) D and cardiovascular risk biomarkers [11, 12], but other studies have not supported the benefit of 25(OH) D supplementation to improve the blood lipid profile [13, 14].

Vitamin D can be affected by environmental factors, such as exposure to ultraviolet light and consumption of foods rich in fat-soluble vitamin D staples (e.g., oily sea fish, meat, and eggs), so repletion of this vitamin’s reserves can be done by such factors [12].

Hypovitaminosis D was shown to be associated not only with lowered insulin secretion and sensitivity but also with adverse effects on TG, total cholesterol, and LDL-cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol concentrations in a study of healthy men and women from several racial and ethnic groups [15].

It has been proposed that vitamin D has a link with different cardiovascular diseases such as HTN, CVD through its different role in endothelial function, blood pressure control, calcification of the coronary vessels, and increased vascular resistance [5, 8, 16]. Also, the effect of vitamin D on the regulation of the lipid profile is one of the proposed mechanisms for the relationship between vitamin D deficiency and the abovementioned disorders. The aim of our study is to determine the association between the serum level of vitamin D and lipid profiles, including serum concentrations of cholesterol, TG, HDL, and LDL in the north of Iran in healthy subjects.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was performed in West Azerbaijan province, a region of the Mediterranean with spring rain at latitude 37°, as a part of a national survey on food and nutrition in the northwest of Iran during winter and summer, 2015. Five hundred and forty-one volunteers with age of 5–60 years from normal and healthy subjects were entered. After dividing the urban area into five different sectors based on socioeconomic status, one health center from each sector was selected randomly. In proportion to the covered child and adult’s population in each center, subjects who were eligible for the study were included consequently, after obtaining written consent.

Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, lactation, use of drugs affecting the lipid profile or calcium and bone metabolism, chronic disorders of the liver or kidney, endocrinology disorders such as hypo- or hyperthyroidism and hyperparathyroidism, smoking, insulin injection, use of anticonvulsive drugs, and vitamin D or calcium supplementation.

Demographics and history of daily or weekly sunlight exposures were recorded in the pre-prepared questionnaire. After overnight fasting, 10 ml of peripheral venous blood sample was withdrawn. Blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min and stored at −20 °C. Serum levels of 25(OH) D were measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the confirmatory test was done by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) which measured 25(OH) D. Measurements were done in two consecutive seasons: winter and summer (2014) for the same subjects.

The normal range for 25(OH) D was considered as 50–75 ng/ml. A 25(OH) D level of lower than 27.5 ng/ml was considered as vitamin D deficiency, levels between 27.5 and 49.99 ng/ml considered as insufficient, and levels of equal and more than 50 ng/ml as sufficient. Plasma total cholesterol, HDL-C, and triglyceride concentrations were measured in duplicate using enzymatic kits, standardized reagents, and standards (Pars Azmoon Co., Tehran, Iran) and autoanalyzer (Selectra E, Vitalab, Holliston, Netherlands). LDL-C concentration was calculated using the Friedewald equation [13, 17].

All continuous values are expressed as mean ± SD, and categorical variables were presented as a percentage. The independent t test was employed to compare differences between the means of continuous variables between two sexes and the season groups. Multivariate analysis and correlation were performed with data to extract associations between vitamin D and different above lipid profiles. One-way ANOVA was used for comparing serum vitamin D and lipid fraction means between three subcategories. Post hoc Tukey test was used for pairwise comparison after ANOVA test. Correlation analysis was recruited for detecting correlations between vitamin D and lipid profiles in the total population with or without considering the season. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed by SPSS statistical software (version 21.0, SPSS Inc.).

Results and discussion

This cross-sectional study was conducted in the northwest of Iran in population groups with different age ranges from 5 to 60 years old. We studied this target population while considering two age subcategories: ≤18-year-old and >18-year-old study populations with two different seasonal categories. Also, another analysis was performed based on sex subgroup classification for different age groups. Mean age in total mixed population was 30.83 ± 14.02 years. In the ≤18 years population, mean age was 10.94 ± 3.21 years, and for the >18 years population, it was 37.89 ± 8.86 years. In the less than 18-year-old category, 55.2% were males and 44.8% female. In the above-18-year-old category, percentages were 45.8 and 54.2% respectively. Mean 25(OH) D in the total population for winter and summer were 45.8 ± 24.26 ng/ml and 55.24 ± 37.47 ng/ml respectively.

The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in males and females was 6.9 and 27.9%, respectively, and the insufficiency of vitamin D was 28.2 and 35.7% respectively. Also, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in the total studied population was 38.08% and the overall vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency according to seasonal categorization were 87.41 and 49.82% in winter and summer, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1 Vitamin D status in two different seasonal categories in summer and winter
Full size table

In the total population, mean differences between winter and summer for 25(OH) D were significant (P < 0.001). Mean 25(OH) D for the population in winter and summer was 30.96 ± 24.26 ng/ml and 55.81 ± 37.39 ng/ml respectively (Fig. 1). Also, additional analysis for comparing mean differences between winter and summer for males and females was significant (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparing mean differences between winter and summer for 25(OH) D (P < 0.001)

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Comparing mean differences between winter and summer for 25(OH) D in different sexes (P < 0.001)

Full size image

The current study revealed that differences of average serum levels of lipids in the studied populations in summer and winter were significant for cholesterol, LDL, and HDL, but no significant difference was found for TG. Analysis for comparing lipid profiles between two genders in winter showed that there were significant differences in all lipid profiles except for LDL, while such analysis for summer revealed that there were no significant differences in lipid profiles except for TG (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparing mean lipid profiles between two genders within different seasons
Full size table

According to the analysis of variances, mean differences for lipid profiles between three groups in different levels of vitamin D indicated that in subgroups with insufficient and deficient levels of vitamin D, there was a significant mean difference only for LDL. Post hoc Tukey test for comparing mean differences are shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Post hoc Tukey test results for comparing mean LDL between two different groups based vitamin D status
Full size table

Correlation analysis among study populations is shown in Fig. 3, with no correlation between 25(OH) D and TG, LDL-C, cholesterol, and HDL.

Fig. 3
figure 3

a Correlation between 25(OH) D level and triglyceride level (r = −0.029; P = 0.638). b Correlation between 25(OH) D level and cholesterol level (r = −0.013; P = 0.826). c Correlation between 25(OH) D level and LDL level (r = −0.015; P = 0.805) d Correlation between 25(OH) D level and HDL level (r = 0.043; P < 0.479)

Full size image

Serum 25(OH) D is a well-recognized biomarker of vitamin D status that best reflects the vitamin D content of the body [3]. Vitamin D can be affected by environmental factors, such as exposure to ultraviolet light and consumption of foods rich in fat-soluble vitamin D staples (e.g., oily sea fish, meat, and eggs), so repletion of this vitamin’s reserves can be done by such factors [12].

This study has established that vitamin D deficiency is more prevalent in the over-18-year-old subgroup but more so in women than in men. Also, vitamin D deficiency was higher in winter than summer. Different studies have reported different values for vitamin D deficiency prevalence. The discrepancies of studies might be partly explained by confounders as age and gender. Similar studies have reported such inequality distribution of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency among two different sexes in Asian Indians [18]. However, some reports have established equal distribution between different sexes in Pakistan [19].

Our finding confirmed an inequality of vitamin D deficiency in subjects between two different genders and seasons. This study like other studies [16] reported that seasonal variation in vitamin D levels can be cited as reasons for overestimation of vitamin D deficiency [20,21,22], so vitamin D status reporting should be done considering season and gender variations.

Results from studies might be confounded by studied population heterogeneity and the confounders such as parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium, physical activity, kidney function, sex, age, sun exposure status, and clothing pattern [7, 10]. The most reason for seasonal variation may be due to less exposure to the sun in some regions of the world and reduced intake of vitamin D. Also changes in estrogen level with increasing age in women and consequently changes in Ca and bone metabolism can be related to vitamin D variation between men and women. Another factor affecting vitamin status and its reduction in females can be women garments in Islamic territories [3, 10].

In some studies, the positive effect on lipid profiles has been proposed for vitamin D, but it is not clear whether or not the beneficial effects of vitamin D are due to the hormone itself or its association with calcium metabolism [6, 23]. Calcium acts to form insoluble soaps with dietary fat, preventing its absorption, thus modulating the effect of high dietary fat on blood lipid concentrations [2].

There are different studies with different results and in some instances conflicting results on the relationship between serum levels of vitamin D and lipid profiles. Ford and colleagues, in their NHANES III study, found a negative association between serum levels of 25(OH) D and TG in patients with hypertriglyceridemia, while this relationship was not observed with regard to HDL cholesterol in healthy subjects [24].

In order to determine relationships between 25(OH) D levels and components of the lipid profile status, average serum levels of lipids in the studied populations in summer and winter were significant for cholesterol, LDL, and HDL, but no significant effect was found for TG. Analysis for comparing lipid profiles between two genders in summer showed that there were significant differences in all lipid profiles except for LDL, while such analysis for winter revealed that there were no significant differences in lipid profiles except for TG.

The possible mechanism for the lowering effect of vitamin D can be included as the first mechanism; vitamin D increases serum calcium by enhancing intestinal calcium absorption. This calcium could then reduce serum triglycerides by reducing hepatic triglyceride formation and secretion [25]. The second mechanism is that vitamin D has a suppressive effect on serum PTH concentration. When heparin lipolytic activity decreased by increased PTH concentration, a lowered level of PTH may reduce serum triglycerides by increasing peripheral uptake. In addition to the above mechanisms, other mechanisms have been implicated. Vitamin D may regulate triglycerides metabolism through of increased expression of VLDL cholesterol gene receptors [6]. Another possible mechanism to explain the association between 25(OH) D and triglycerides would be through insulin resistance: when vitamin D deficiency is present, the risk of insulin resistance increases and this is associated with an elevation of levels of VLDL cholesterol and triglycerides [26].

In some cross-sectional studies, an association between an increase in vitamin D level and a decline in LDL, cholesterol, and TG and an increase in HDL have been proposed [5, 6, 13, 14, 27], and so far, intervention trials have not clarified the relationship between serum lipids and vitamin D-calcium supplementation for improving lipid profiles [13, 28].

In the Kelishadi review [10], inverse weak significant association between 25(OH) D and triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL-C and direct association with HDL-C was showed, but in the Jorde and Grimnes review [15], five of the seven papers reported positive associations of vitamin D level with LDL but only one being statistically significant, while three reported negative associations, with one being significant.

A meta-analysis by Wang et al. observed a slight effect of vitamin D supplementation on LDL, but no effect on TC, HDL, or TG [11].

Our result-based correlation analysis showed that there was no correlation between vitamin D and any of the lipid profile parameters. In other studies such as Johnson et al. and Rusconi et al. [20, 29], such results have been presented where there were no statistically significant correlations between 25(OH) D levels and total serum cholesterol. But in the Rajakumar et al. study, there were positive correlations between plasma 25(OH) D and HDL cholesterol in black and white children [3].

One of the limitations of this study was the lack of dietary intake and physical activity assessment besides the evaluation of serum levels of vitamin D. Another limitation in this study was its implementation just for an urban area since those who live in rural areas can benefit from higher physical activity and sun exposure.

Conclusions

This study showed that serum levels of vitamin D can be different in the two seasons regardless of gender variations. Also, its association with a lipid profile is still conflicting and debatable. To find the true relationship between vitamin D status and lipid profile, alongside with full control of confounding factors, group synchronization in randomized controlled trials is recommended.

Abbreviations

25(OH) D:

25, hydroxy vitamin D3

CVD:

Cerebrovascular disease

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

HDL:

High-density lipoprotein

HPLC:

High-performance liquid chromatography

LDL:

Low-density lipoprotein

NHANES III:

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III

PTH:

Parathyroid hormone

TG:

Triglyceride

References

  1. Jorde R, Grimnes G. Vitamin D and metabolic health with special reference to the effect of vitamin D on serum lipids. Prog Lipid Res. 2011;50(4):303–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Steger FL. Associations between vitamin D status and blood lipid parameters in healthy, older adults. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rajakumar K, de Las HJ, Chen TC, Lee S, Holick MF, Arslanian SA. Vitamin D status, adiposity, and lipids in black American and Caucasian children. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 2011;96(5):1560–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Delvin EE, Lambert M, Levy E, O’Loughlin J, Mark S, Gray-Donald K, et al. Vitamin D status is modestly associated with glycemia and indicators of lipid metabolism in French-Canadian children and adolescents. J Nutr. 2010;140(5):987–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saedisomeolia A, Taheri E, Djalali M, Moghadam AM, Qorbani M. Association between serum level of vitamin D and lipid profiles in type 2 diabetic patients in Iran. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2014;13(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chaudhuri JR, Mridula KR, Anamika A, Boddu DB, Misra PK, Lingaiah A, et al. Deficiency of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and dyslipidemia in Indian subjects. Journal Lipids. 2013;2013:623420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pilz S, Marz W, Wellnitz B, Seelhorst U, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Dimai HP, et al. Association of vitamin D deficiency with heart failure and sudden cardiac death in a large cross-sectional study of patients referred for coronary angiography. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 2008;93(10):3927–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Al Mheid I, Patel R, Murrow J, Morris A, Rahman A, Fike L, et al. Vitamin D status is associated with arterial stiffness and vascular dysfunction in healthy humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(2):186–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zakeri H. Vitamin D, deficiency prevalence in summer compared to winter in a city with high humidity and a sultry climate. Women. 2011;94:90.6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kelishadi R, Farajzadegan Z, Bahreynian M. Association between vitamin D status and lipid profile in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2014;65(4):404–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang H, Xia N, Yang Y, Peng D-Q. Influence of vitamin D supplementation on plasma lipid profiles: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lipids Health Dis. 2012;11(1):1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. John WG, Noonan K, Mannan N, Boucher BJ. Hypovitaminosis D is associated with reductions in serum apolipoprotein AI but not with fasting lipids in British Bangladeshis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82(3):517–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ponda MP, Huang XX, Odeh MA, Breslow JL, Kaufman HW. Vitamin D may not improve lipid levels: a serial clinical laboratory data study. Circulation. 2012;126(3):270–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Rajpathak SN, Xue X, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Van Horn L, Robinson JG, Liu S, et al. Effect of 5 y of calcium plus vitamin D supplementation on change in circulating lipids: results from the Women’s Health Initiative. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91(4):894–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Grimnes G, Figenschau Y, Almås B, Jorde R. Vitamin D, insulin secretion, sensitivity, and lipids result from a case-control study and a randomized controlled trial using hyperglycemic clamp technique. Diabetes. 2011;60(11):2748–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Alam U, Najam O, Al‐Himdani S, Benoliel S, Jinadev P, Berry J, et al. Marked vitamin D deficiency in patients with diabetes in the UK: ethnic and seasonal differences and an association with dyslipidemia. Diabet Med. 2012;29(10):1343–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Choi HS, Kim K-A, Lim C-Y, Rhee SY, Hwang Y-C, Kim KM, et al. Low serum vitamin D is associated with high risk of diabetes in Korean adults. J Nutr. 2011;141(8):1524–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vupputuri MR, Goswami R, Gupta N, Ray D, Tandon N, Kumar N. Prevalence and functional significance of 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency and vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms in Asian Indians. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83(6):1411–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sheikh A, Saeed Z, Jafri SAD, Yazdani I, Hussain SA. Vitamin D levels in an asymptomatic adults—a population survey in Karachi, Pakistan. PloS one. 2012;7(3):e33452.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson MD, Nader NS, Weaver AL, Singh R, Kumar S. Relationships between 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and plasma glucose and lipid levels in pediatric outpatients. J Pediatr. 2010;156(3):444–9. e1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rejnmark L, Vestergaard P, Heickendorff L, Mosekilde L. Simvastatin does not affect vitamin D status, but low vitamin D levels are associated with dyslipidemia: results from a randomized, controlled trial. International journal of endocrinology. 2009;2010:Article ID 957174, 6 pages. doi:10.1155/2010/957174.

  22. Toxqui L, Blanco-Rojo R, Wright I, Pérez-Granados AM, Vaquero MP. Changes in blood pressure and lipid levels in young women consuming a vitamin D-fortified skimmed milk: a randomized controlled trial. Nutrients. 2013;5(12):4966–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Qin XF, Zhao LS, Chen WR, Wang H. Effects of vitamin D on plasma lipid profiles in statin-treated patients with hypercholesterolemia: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2015;34(2):201–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ford ES, Ajani UA, McGuire LC, Liu S. Concentrations of serum vitamin D and the metabolic syndrome among US adults. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(5):1228–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Martins D, Wolf M, Pan D, Zadshir A, Tareen N, Thadhani R, et al. Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and the serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in the United States: data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(11):1159–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ginsberg HN, Zhang Y-L, Hernandez-Ono A. Regulation of plasma triglycerides in insulin resistance and diabetes. Arch Med Res. 2005;36(3):232–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Karhapää P, Pihlajamäki J, Pörsti I, Kastarinen M, Mustonen J, Niemelä O, et al. Diverse associations of 25‐hydroxyvitamin D and 1, 25‐dihydroxy‐vitamin D with dyslipidaemias. J Intern Med. 2010;268(6):604–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Andersen R, Brot C, Mejborn H, Mølgaard C, Skovgaard LT, Trolle E, et al. Vitamin D supplementation does not affect serum lipids and lipoproteins in Pakistani immigrants. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63(9):1150–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rusconi RE, De Cosmi V, Gianluca G, Giavoli C, Agostoni C. Vitamin D insufficiency in obese children and relation with lipid profile. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2015;66(2):132–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all respected experts in the health departments of Urmia University of Medical Sciences and other individuals who had sincere cooperation in conducting this study in the Ministry of Education in West Azerbaijan.

Availability of data and materials

Please contact the author for data requests.

Authors’ contributions

SNS was the study designer and program manager. DV has participated in the data handling and analysis, the result, and full manuscript preparation. FB has participated in executive management for data collection, sampling, and laboratory test work coordination. ZV has participated in assessing the laboratory-used methods, statistical data analysis evaluation, scientific evaluation, and editing. All authors have seen and approved the final manuscript that has been submitted.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethic committee from the deputy of research and technology in Urmia University of Medical Sciences (UMSU), and all participants filled out the consent form.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Food and Beverages Safety Research Center, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran

    Sakineh Nouri Saeidlou

  2. Maternal and Child Obesity Research Center (MCORC), Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran

    Davoud Vahabzadeh

  3. Deputy of Health, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran

    Fariba Babaei

  4. Liver & Digestive Research Center, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran

    Zakaria Vahabzadeh

Authors
  1. Sakineh Nouri Saeidlou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Davoud Vahabzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fariba Babaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zakaria Vahabzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davoud Vahabzadeh.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nouri Saeidlou , S., Vahabzadeh, D., Babaei, F. et al. Seasonal variations of vitamin D and its relation to lipid profile in Iranian children and adults. J Health Popul Nutr 36, 21 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-017-0096-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-017-0096-y

Keywords

Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition

ISSN: 2072-1315

Contact us