Skip to main content

Table 4 Association between health-related quality of life and antenatal care utilization: regression analysis using the EQ-5D and EQ-VAS

From: Health-related quality of life determinants among Rwandan women after delivery: does antenatal care utilization matter? A cross-sectional study

 

Model 1 (EQ-5D as the outcome)

Model 2 (EQ-VAS as the outcome)

 

Coef.

P

[95% C. I.]

Coef.

P

[95% C. I.]

Social support (ref = Poor social support)

 Good social support

0.062

0.000

0.033; 0.091

9.222

0.000

6.264; 12.180

Wealth quintiles (ref = Lowest)

 Second

0.024

0.287

−0.020; 0.069

4.124

0.081

−0.516; 8.766

 Middle

0.047

0.016

0.009; 0.086

5.807

0.005

1.781; 9.834

 Fourth

0.005

0.813

−0.038; 0.049

4.399

0.063

−0.239; 9.038

 Highest

0.059

0.013

0.012; 0.107

9.200

0.000

4.615; 13.785

Place of residence (ref = Rural)

 Urban

−0.044

0.008

−0.077; − 0.011

   

Educational level (ref = Some primary)

 Primary completed

   

−4.260

0.012

−7.583; −0.936

 Lower secondary or vocational

   

−0.266

0.895

−4.216; 3.684

 Upper secondary or university

   

2.205

0.292

−1.901; 6.312

Marital status (ref = Married)

 Cohabitant

   

−4.164

0.006

−7.150; −1.178

 Separated

   

−5.757

0.263

−15.848; 4.334

 Unmarried/single

   

−7.585

0.001

−12.069; −3.101

ANC utilization (ref = Inadequate ANC attendance)

 Adequate ANC

   

3.551

0.008

0.924; 6.179

  1. Notes: Using robust standard errors