Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 4 Association between health-related quality of life and antenatal care utilization: regression analysis using the EQ-5D and EQ-VAS

From: Health-related quality of life determinants among Rwandan women after delivery: does antenatal care utilization matter? A cross-sectional study

  Model 1 (EQ-5D as the outcome) Model 2 (EQ-VAS as the outcome)
  Coef. P [95% C. I.] Coef. P [95% C. I.]
Social support (ref = Poor social support)
 Good social support 0.062 0.000 0.033; 0.091 9.222 0.000 6.264; 12.180
Wealth quintiles (ref = Lowest)
 Second 0.024 0.287 −0.020; 0.069 4.124 0.081 −0.516; 8.766
 Middle 0.047 0.016 0.009; 0.086 5.807 0.005 1.781; 9.834
 Fourth 0.005 0.813 −0.038; 0.049 4.399 0.063 −0.239; 9.038
 Highest 0.059 0.013 0.012; 0.107 9.200 0.000 4.615; 13.785
Place of residence (ref = Rural)
 Urban −0.044 0.008 −0.077; − 0.011    
Educational level (ref = Some primary)
 Primary completed     −4.260 0.012 −7.583; −0.936
 Lower secondary or vocational     −0.266 0.895 −4.216; 3.684
 Upper secondary or university     2.205 0.292 −1.901; 6.312
Marital status (ref = Married)
 Cohabitant     −4.164 0.006 −7.150; −1.178
 Separated     −5.757 0.263 −15.848; 4.334
 Unmarried/single     −7.585 0.001 −12.069; −3.101
ANC utilization (ref = Inadequate ANC attendance)
 Adequate ANC     3.551 0.008 0.924; 6.179
  1. Notes: Using robust standard errors