Skip to main content

Table 3 Between groups comparison of study variables’ mean scales, after the intervention

From: Impacts of gain versus loss frame messages about beverages on boy students, an application of extended parallel process model

Variable

One-way ANOVA

Post hoc (Tukey HSD)

Pairwise intergroup comparison

F

P

Control-GFM

Control-LFM

GFM-LFM

F

F

F

Perceived efficacy

5.65

.004

−2.13*

−2.05*

0.08

Perceived response efficacy

4.65

.01

−0.91

−1.16*

−0.25

Perceived Self-efficacy

3.82

.02

−1.22*

−0.87

0.35

Perceived threat

9.76

 < .001

−0.37

−2.34*

−1.96*

Perceived Susceptibility

2.60

.076

0.56

−0.22

−0.78

Perceived severity

12.43

 < .001

−0.93

−2.05*

−1.12*

Intention

3.11

.046

0.63

1.34*

0.71

Daily SSBs consumption(glasses)

7.36

.48

0.34

0.05

−0.29

  1. SSBs sugar-sweetened beverages, GFM  gain frame message, LFM loss frame message
  2. *p < .001