Skip to main content

Table 3 Between groups comparison of study variables’ mean scales, after the intervention

From: Impacts of gain versus loss frame messages about beverages on boy students, an application of extended parallel process model

Variable One-way ANOVA Post hoc (Tukey HSD)
Pairwise intergroup comparison
F P Control-GFM Control-LFM GFM-LFM
F F F
Perceived efficacy 5.65 .004 −2.13* −2.05* 0.08
Perceived response efficacy 4.65 .01 −0.91 −1.16* −0.25
Perceived Self-efficacy 3.82 .02 −1.22* −0.87 0.35
Perceived threat 9.76  < .001 −0.37 −2.34* −1.96*
Perceived Susceptibility 2.60 .076 0.56 −0.22 −0.78
Perceived severity 12.43  < .001 −0.93 −2.05* −1.12*
Intention 3.11 .046 0.63 1.34* 0.71
Daily SSBs consumption(glasses) 7.36 .48 0.34 0.05 −0.29
  1. SSBs sugar-sweetened beverages, GFM  gain frame message, LFM loss frame message
  2. *p < .001