Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis

From: Dietary inflammatory potential and the incidence of depression and anxiety: a meta-analysis

Study

Location (cohort)

Design

Follow-up, years

Subjects at baseline, n

Females, %

Age at baseline

Quality score

Açik et al. [19]

Turkish

Cross-sectional

N/A

134

100

24 ± 5.1

7

Adjibade et al. [20]

French

Cohort

5.4

26,730

24

48.3 ± 11.2

9

Akbaraly et al. [21]

UK

Cohort

5

4246

25

60.9 ± 5.9

7

Bergmans et al. [22]

USA

Cross-sectional

N/A

11,592

52

48.1 ± 7.8

7

Haghighatdoost et al. [23]

Iran

Cross-sectional

N/A

3363

59

36.2 ± 9.2

8

Jorgensen et al. [24]

USA

Cross-sectional

N/A

11,624

48

46.0 ± 0.34

7

Lucas et al. [25]

USA

Cohort

12

43,685

100

62.6 ± 7.0

8

Phillips et al. [26]

Ireland

Cross-sectional

N/A

1992

51

59.7 ± 5.5

8

Salari-Moghaddam et al. [27]

Iran

Cross-sectional

N/A

2016

59

35.7 ± 5.3

7

Salari-Moghaddam et al. [28]

Iran

Cross-sectional

N/A

3363

58

36.3 ± 7.8

7

Sanchez-Villages et al. [29]

Spain

Cohort

8.5

15,093

59

38.3 ± 12.1

7

Shivappa et al. [30]

Iran

Cross-sectional

N/A

300

100

16.2 ± 1.0

8

Shivappa et al. [31]

Australia

Cohort

12

6438

100

52.0 ± 1.4

8

Shivappa et al. [32]

USA

Cohort

8

3608

57

61.4 ± 9.2

8

Vermeulen et al. [33]

Italy

Cohort

9

827

58

73.8 ± 6.8

8

Wirth et al. [34]

USA

Cross-sectional

N/A

18,875

51

46.9

8

Adjibade et al. [35]

France

Cohort

12.6

3523

58

49.5 ± 6.2

7