Skip to main content

Table 2 Family planning use and knowledge

From: Evaluating the impact of social franchising on family planning use in Kenya

 

Full sample n = 5609

Matched sample n = 5269

 

Control

Tunza

p value

Control

Tunza

p value

Currently pregnant

7.14

8.08

0.336

7.90

7.88

0.809

Currently using FP

58.68

57.69

0.751

60.18

59.59

0.861

Currently using modern FP

53.36

51.55

0.532

53.52

53.35

0.955

Currently using LAPM

21.88

26.56

0.071

20.94

27.26

0.028

New user of FP

25.25

27.29

0.560

27.61

27.76

0.968

Source of current FP

 Public sector

77.83

54.36

<0.001

77.60

53.81

<0.001

 Franchise

1.58

16.78

–

1.35

16.26

–

 Other private

20.12

27.89

–

20.56

29.02

–

Method knowledge (avg # known)

8.18

7.87

0.477

8.18

7.94

0.566

 Female sterilization

63.09

55.52

0.179

60.55

55.95

0.372

 Male sterilization

43.80

38.89

0.123

43.18

39.11

0.253

 IUD

80.32

79.37

0.758

80.92

79.86

0.727

 Injectable

92.29

93.51

0.533

92.49

94.03

0.381

 Implant

82.67

83.06

0.905

83.34

84.14

0.796

 Pill

88.70

89.00

0.916

88.38

89.25

0.748

 Male condom

80.04

79.04

0.822

79.64

79.09

0.905

 Female condom

63.83

59.35

0.329

64.99

59.85

0.280

 SDM

32.71

30.52

0.554

31.93

31.41

0.895

 LAM

39.12

35.47

0.423

38.89

36.57

0.596

 Rhythm method

52.34

47.71

0.452

51.75

48.18

0.584

 Withdrawal

51.21

47.47

0.446

52.43

48.24

0.395

 EC

47.80

48.02

0.963

49.18

47.93

0.806

  1. Full sample weighted by population size of location; matched sample weighted by population size and stratum; p values from t tests (for means) or chi2 tests (for proportions) comparing control and Tunza groups; standard errors adjusted for clustering by facility catchment area
Back to article page

Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition

ISSN: 2072-1315

Contact us