Skip to main content

Table 2 Ethnical and geographical factors investigated in the systematic review

From: A global systematic overview of socioeconomic factors associated with antidiabetic medication adherence in individuals with type 2 diabetes

Ethnical and geographical factors

Subgroups

Direction of the association with antidiabetic medication adherence

Increase

Equal

Decrease

Ethnicity/race

Ethnicity

CS: 1 [121]

CS: 5 [39, 43, 72, 107, 122] RCT: 2 [123, 124]

 
 

Non-white

  

CS: 1 [60]

C: 2 [104, 125]

 

Non-European

  

C: 1 [126]

 

African-American

  

C: 1 [127]

 

Black

  

C: 4 [83, 86, 88, 128]

CC:1 [90]

I: 2 [51, 89]

 

Asian

CS: 1 [36]

  
 

Malay

  

CS: 1 [111]

 

Indian

CS: 1 [111]

  
 

Chinese

 

C: 1 [124]

CS: 1 [99]

 

Japanese

 

C: 1 [124]

 
 

Filipino

  

C: 1 [124]

 

Saudi Arabian

CS: 1 [101]

  
 

Arab non-Emirati

CS: 1 [36]

  
 

Pacific Islander

  

C: 3 [35, 122, 124]

 

Maori

  

C: 3 [35, 37, 122]

 

Latin-American/Hispanic

  

CS: 1 [121]

C: 2 [88, 129]

 

Native Hawaiian

  

CS: 1 [124]

Country of birth

Foreign-born

 

CS: 1 [85]

 
 

US-born

  

CS: 1 [71]

Acculturation

Acculturation

CS: 1 [39]

  
 

Believe in traditional Chinese medicine

  

CS: 1 [39]

Accessibility to health care

Accessibility to health care*

   
 

Distance to healthcare provider

  

CS: 3 [31, 61, 101]

Area of residence

Area of residence

 

CS: 5 [31, 80, 98, 100, 130] C: 1 [122]

 
 

Rural

C: 1 [104]

  
 

Urban

  

CS: 2 [45, 58]

 

IMD quintile

C: 1 [125]

  
 

Neighbourhood deprivation

  

CS: 2 [37, 77]

 

Socioeconomic living area

 

C: 1 [126]

 

Regional differences

Geographical area

C: 1 [104]

CS: 2 [41, 110]

 
 

Southern United States

  

C: 1 [95]

  1. Factors marked with *—a study has found an association, but did not state in which direction [105]
  2. Type of study—CS cross-sectional, C Cohort, I interventional, RCT randomized controlled trial
  3. Bolded numbers—Number of articles
  4. Number in brackets—References to the articles
  5. IMD indices of multiple deprivation