Skip to main content

Table 4 Risk of bias and summary of risk of selected studies

From: Pooled estimate of vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Risk of bias

Krishnaveni et al. 2011 [37]

Veena et al.

2017 [38]

Nandal et al.

2016 [39]

Dasgupta

et al.

2012 [42]

Sachan et al.

2005 [31]

Sahu et al.

2009 [33]

Farrant et al.

2009 [32]

Sharma

et al.

2016  [36]

Marwaha et al. 2011 [7]

Jani

et al.

2014 [9]

Ajmani

et al. 2016 [35]

Chary et al.

2015 [41]

Kumar

et al.

2015 [40]

Singla

et al.

2015 [34]

Sablok

et al. 2015 [43]

Representation of data

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

Low risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

High

risk

Sampling

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

low risk

High risk

high risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

Random selection

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Non-response bias

High risk

High risk

Low risk

Low risk

High risk

Low risk

High risk

High risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

High risk

High risk

Low risk

Data collected directly from subject

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

High risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Case definition

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Reliability and validity of method

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Same mode of data collected

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Length of the shortest period of the prevalence

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Numerator and denominator

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

Low risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

Low risk

Summary*

High risk of bias

High risk of bias

High risk of bias

High risk of bias

High risk of bias

Low risk of bias

High risk of bias

High risk of bias

High risk of bias

High risk of bias

High risk of bias

High risk of bias

High risk of bias

High risk of bias

Moderate risk of bias

  1. Low risk of bias: all criteria met (i.e., low for each domain). *Moderate risk of bias: one to two criteria not met (i.e., high for each domain), High risk of bias: more than two criteria not met (i.e., high for each domain)