Skip to main content

Table 4 Estimates of five outcome variables at baseline, follow-up and the difference and significance tests of change, by study arm

From: An experiment of health services and additional microcredit in 128 villages of Bangladesh

Study arm

Sample size

Value of indicator at

Difference (Fup-Bs)

McNemar’s p value

Baseline

Follow-up

Percentage of households not food deficit during year (food security)

All areas

3687

67.4

85.6

18.2

0.001

Control*

937

67.5

87.1

19.6

0.001

MC-only*

921

72.0

85.5

13.5

0.001

HS-only*

914

62.8

83.1

20.3

0.001

MC and HS*

915

67.1

87.2

20.1

0.001

Percentage currently participating in microcredit

All areas

3687

31.6

30.7

− 0.9

0.87

Control

937

31.3

33.2

1.9

0.90

MC-only

921

30.2

26.9

− 3.3

0.26

HS-only

914

35.1

35.8

0.7

0.74

MC and HS

915

29.6

27.8

− 1.8

0.19

Percentage currently using contraception (currently married women age 15–49)

All areas

2839

64.6

67.6

3.0

0.17

Control*

728

64.8

69.6

4.8

0.02

MC-only

721

65.0

66.4

1.4

0.48

HS-only

705

65.3

68.1

2.8

0.15

MC and HS

685

63.4

66.3

2.9

0.17

Study arm

Sample size (baseline, follow-up)

Value of indicator at

Difference

p value

Baseline

Follow-up

Percent with trained birth attendant at last birth

All areas

1164, 915

31.6

36.4

4.8

0.06

Control

302,235

33.2

28.5

− 4.7

0.37

MC-only

301,243

31.4

33.0

1.6

0.18

HS-only*

283,223

29.1

43.9

14.8

 < 0.01

MC & HS

278,214

33.5

39.7

6.2

0.32

Percent of children 12–23 months old with measles immunization

All areas

377,268

87.9

86.6

− 1.3

0.33

Control

95 61

88.5

93.5

5.0

0.14

MC-only

90,70

84.6

79.9

− 4.7

0.28

HS-only

92,69

90.1

83.1

− 7.0

0.19

MC & HS

100,68

90.0

88.7

− 2.3

0.46

  1. *p < 0.05 for test of the hypothesis of no change between baseline and follow-up surveys