Skip to main content

Table 3 The characteristics of studies included in the two-class meta-analysis regarding the comparison of WC in children and adolescents with high screen time versus low screen time

From: The association between screen use and central obesity among children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal / Year

First author

Country

Setting/ num

Age (y)

Central obesity definition

Disease status

Screen tools

High screen time definition

Main findings

Revista Paulista de Pediatria/ 2016*

Castro JAC [9]

Brazil

School/ 930

14–19

WC ≥ 85th percentile

Healthy

TV, PC, VG

 ≥ 2 h /d

WC was significantly higher among those with video game time more than 2 h (P = 0.01). For other screens, the difference was not significant (for PC, P = 0.83; for TV, P = 0.23)

Int J Obes (Lond)/ 2014

Berentzen NE [25]

Netherland

Community/ 1447

11

WC ≥ 85th percentile

Healthy

TV, PC

 ≥ 2 h /d

Significantly higher screen time in the highest versus lowest quintile of central obesity (P = 0.0001)

J Adolesc/ 2016

Suchert, V [40]

Germany

School/ 1228

12–17

WC ≥ 85th percentile

Healthy

TV, DVD, PC

 ≥ 2 h /d

Significantly higher WC in those with more than 2 h/day screen time compared with those with less than 2 h per day (P = 0.003)

Iran J Public Health/ 2015

Safari S [41]

Iran

School/ 5326

10–18

WC ≥ 85th percentile

Healthy

TV, PC

 ≥ 2 h /d

Those with the highest screen time had significantly higher WC (P < 0.05)

  1. TV television, PC personal computer, VG video game, OR odds ratio, WC waist circumference, WHR waist to hip ratio, CI confidence interval, ST screen time
  2. *We included the results of the study by Castro JAC et al. [9] as three separate studies (TV, PC, VG). All the studies were performed in both genders, used questionnaire for screen time measurement, had cross-sectional design, and the participants were apparently healthy