Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Mapping the landscape and structure of global research on nutrition and COVID-19: visualization analysis

Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition volume 41, Article number: 25 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had a significant influence on nutritional status. There have been several studies on dietary habits and nutritional status in connection with COVID-19. However, there has been no research on the bibliometric analysis of these papers. Therefore, our objective was to assess the most relevant scientific research on nutrition and COVID-19, as well as to assess current hot themes.

Methods

We obtained data from the Scopus database on June 30, 2021. Qualitative and quantitative analyzes were conducted based on the Scopus. Collaboration and term analysis was performed using VOSviewer software version 1.6.16.

Results

At the time of data collection, there were 177,946 documents in COVID-19. Scopus found 1885 articles related to nutrition and COVID-19 after narrowing the search to those terms. This includes 1309 (69.44%) research articles, 268 (14.22%) review papers, and 308 other types of document. The USA was the largest producer, with 24.83% of the documents, followed by Italy with 11.88% (n = 224), the UK with 10.82% (n = 204), and China with 7.59% (n = 143). The most active institution was Sapienza Università di Roma (n = 30, 1.59%). The leading journal in COVID-19 nutrition research was Nutrients (n = 115, 6.10%). The article with 310 citations published by Di Renzo et al. in 2020 was the most influential reference. The hot topics were stratified into three clusters: (1) “Food security in the COVID-19 pandemic”; (2) “nutritional determinants and COVID-19 outcomes”; and (3) “changes in dietary habits during the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences”.

Conclusions

This is the first bibliometric research to offer comprehensive information on COVID-19 and nutrition in the published literature. Research will likely be helpful to scholars and policymakers. This study sheds light on the growth and development of nutrition and covid-19-related research and should contribute to the expansion of the global frontier in the major hot topics, including “food security in the COVID-19 pandemic”; “nutritional determinants and COVID-19 outcomes”; and “changes in diet habits during the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences”.

Background

The threat of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to global security and economy has captured the attention of the entire world [1]. COVID-19 has been causing havoc in the global system at various levels and changing the lifestyles of the public [2]. Moreover, countries with a low or middle income complain of nutritional deficiency, which is expected to worsen during the COVID-19 crisis [3]. Therefore, this unprecedented pandemic has many undesirable influences, not only on the food supply chain [4] but also on food security, including nutritional status and diet habits [5]. As mentioned recently, global food systems are desperately in desperate need of a sustainable and nutritional overhaul [6], as evidenced by the fact that food and nutrition are linked to all Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [7].

Previous reports linked the consumption of an unhealthy diet with the risk of mortality from noncommunicable diseases [8, 9]. However, the impact of bad eating habits is not limited to that, but may extend to infectious diseases such as COVID-19 [10]. Many articles focused on the benefits of consuming diets rich in antioxidants, such as essential vitamins and minerals, as well as a commitment to the Mediterranean diet, and at the same time avoiding refined foods and saturated lipids wherever possible, which are the composition of the Western diet, improving immune functions and subsequently, decreasing the risk of COVID-19 and severe events [10,11,12,13].

Population eating behaviors have been changing throughout the world, particularly those in quarantine due to the COVID-19 crisis [2, 14]. It should be noted that a study showed that people tend to consume unhealthy nutrition and decrease bodily activities during lockdown [2]. Another study found that people whose body mass index was ≥ 25 were more likely to have unhealthy eating habits [15]. On the other hand, the COVID-19 crisis has profound effects on food security, in which it can weaken the ability of people to get essential nutrition due to stock shortages or food costs [5, 16]. Furthermore, some research provided certain recommendations and tactics to the public to maintain and improve their nutritional status during the COVID-19 pandemic [12, 17].

Most prior research examined the worldwide scientific literature on COVID-19-related topics, such as COVID-19 and older adults [18], COVID-19 pandemic and sustainable development goals [19], rheumatology and COVID-19 [20], COVID-19 and depressive disorders [21], COVID-19 and ophthalmology [22], dental scientific literature on COVID-19 [23], COVID-19 and diabetes [24], and COVID-19 in environmental [25], using bibliometric network analysis. However, according to the literature review, scientific trends and hotspots in relation to the pandemic and its association with nutrition are unknown. Bibliometric is a useful technique for quantifying and qualitatively analyze changes in research activity over time. It has grown in popularity to obtain knowledge in particular subjects [26], and it is important to guide future research priorities. Therefore, our objective was to assess the most relevant scientific research on nutrition and COVID-19, as well as to assess current hot themes.

Methods

Data source

Scopus' online database was used to search for published publications (last access date: June 30, 2021). Scopus is an Elsevier-owned abstracting and citation database and includes the most relevant scientific search engines and databases for retrieving bibliometric data. Compared to other databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, Scopus is widely considered the primary quality-oriented database on a global scale, containing a more standardized record for retrieving the global scientific literature in a variety of research areas [27, 28].

Search strategy

We used an advanced search in the Scopus database to find relevant publications on nutrition and COVID-19 during the early stages between January 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021. To avoid the risk of bias induced by constant database changes, the retrieval and export of articles should occur within a single day (June 30, 2020). The data from this study were recovered using the following strategy:

  • Step 1: Reviewing the literature (i.e., systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies) on nutrition and COVID-19 research to identify relevant keywords for search.

  • Step 2: To achieve the objectives of the terms linked with COVID-19 were put into the Scopus research engine. They were derived from earlier COVID-19 bibliometric studies [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. All chosen "terms" were put in the section "Article Title/Abstract/Keywords."

  • Step 3: Subsequently, we limited the documents identified in step 2 to those having the phrase "nutrition and associated terms" in their titles. Nutrition-related terms were extracted from PubMed Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and from prior systematic and meta-analysis with COVID-19 in the nutrition field [38,39,40,41] and entered into the Scopus Engine.

Bibliometric indicators

This study assessed the following areas of research: (1) publication output and article types; (2) the top ten most influential journals with their impact factors; (3) the top ten most cited articles; (4) the top ten countries' research productivity; and (5) the top ten institutes' research productivity.

Data analysis and visualization

Social network analysis was used to identify dynamic patterns of emphasis and links between the top producing countries and hot topics related to the investigated topic. This analysis was carried out in this study using the user-friendly program VOSviewer version 1.6.16 (created by Leiden University in the Netherlands). VOSviewer assists in creating clear information for visualization in many knowledge fields by displaying a graphic map of the bibliometric data's relationships in the cluster [42, 43].

Results

Volume of publications

At the time of data collection, there were 177,946 documents in COVID-19 (June 30, 2021). Scopus found 1885 articles after narrowing the search to those related to nutrition and COVID-19. This includes 1309 (69.44%) research articles, 268 (14.22%) review papers, and 308 as other types of documents.

Contributions of countries to global publications

A total of 167 countries contributed to the production of nutrition and COVID-19 research. The top ten most productive countries are presented in Table 1. This analysis shows that ten countries represent 85.20% of production, with the USA being the largest producer, with 24.83% of the documents, followed by Italy with 11.88% (n = 224), the UK with 10.82% (n = 204) and China with 7.59% (n = 143). As seen in Fig. 1, a network of countries was constructed. This network has 23 nodes, each of which represents a distinct country with a minimum of 30 articles, and each link indicates a relationship between two countries. The USA, followed by Italy, the UK, and China, are at the forefront of collaboration and have the strongest alliance ties in research with other nations.

Table 1 Top ten countries published in the field of nutrition and COVID-19
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Shows the collaborative network of the most productive countries. This graphical collaboration map was generated after at least 30 publications were placed in each country. This criterium was met by 23 countries out of 167 countries published in this field. The size of the node represents the number of publications for that country

Full size image

Active institutions/organizations

Table 2 shows the top ten active institutions for nutrition and COVID-19 related articles. Sapienza Università di Roma (n = 30, 1.59%) was the top, followed by the International Institute of Food Policy Research (n = 25, 1.33%) and Università degli Studi di Milano (n = 24; 1.27%). The majority of active institutions were from Italy (n = 3), followed by the USA (n = 2), France (n = 2), and one institute from Canada, the UK, Saudi Arabia and Brazil.

Table 2 Top ten organizations published in the field of nutrition and COVID-19
Full size table

Active journals

The top ten journals are Nutrients (n = 115, 6.10%), Sustainability Switzerland (n = 52, 2.76%), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (n = 46, 2.44%), Appetite (n = 35, 1.86%), Public Health Nutrition (n = 31, 1.64%) and so on (Table 3).

Table 3 List of the top ten productive journals in the field of nutrition and COVID-19
Full size table

Top-cited publications

The top ten articles were cited 2012 times in total number of, and the average total citations was 182.9 (ranging from 116 to 310) [2, 5, 10,11,12, 14, 15, 17, 44, 45]. Table 4 shows the top ten publications with more than 166 citations.

Table 4 The top ten articles with most total citations in the field of nutrition and COVID-19
Full size table

Research themes in nutrition and COVID-19-related literature

The terms most commonly used in the titles and abstracts of articles related to nutrition and COVID-19 are depicted in Fig. 2. The bigger the circle, the more frequently a given phrase appears, and the narrower the space between two terms or circles, the more frequently the terms appear together. Colors represent groups of terms that are closely related. Cluster analysis based on term cooccurrence showed three primary clusters (green, blue, and red). The key terms related to ‘changes in dietary habits during the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences’ are located in the red group and are significantly associated with terms from the other groups. ‘Food security in the COVID-19 pandemic’ (cluster 1, green), ‘nutritional determinants and outcomes of COVID-19’ (cluster 2, blue) and “changes in dietary habits during the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences’ (cluster 3, red) are the three clusters (Fig. 2). Food security, food insecurity, food system, food supply, food production, and food safety are the most prominent terms in cluster 1. Nutritional status, outcome, patient, death, management, symptoms, and treatment are some of the most prevalent terms in cluster 2. Dietary habits, physical activity, vegetable food consumption, and weight are the most often used terms in cluster 3.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Visualization of the network of publications associated with nutrition and COVID-19 based on the titles/abstracts of the retrieved literature. Each node in the map indicates a term that appeared at least 50 times, and the size of a term's node is proportional to the number of times that the term appeared. Cluster analysis based on term cooccurrence showed three primary clusters (green, blue, and red). ‘Food security in the COVID-19 pandemic’ (cluster 1, green), ‘nutritional determinants and COVID-19 results’ (cluster 2, blue), and ‘changes in dietary habits during the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences’ (cluster 3, red) are the three clusters

Full size image

Discussion

Current scientific research is critical for the prevention and control, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic that leads to a high worldwide death rate worldwide [46]. Although most of the scientific literature was created in a relatively short period of time, an examination of research related to the COVID-19 pandemic is necessary. This bibliometric analysis is unique in that it is the first to identify and evaluate the features of scientific publications on COVID-19 nutrition scientific publications released during the early stages of the pandemic. The analysis of 1885 scientific articles published between January 2020 and July 2021 reveals which countries and institutions have contributed the most publications and which journals have published the most volumes of COVID-19 nutrition research and highlights the most cited publications and the main research issues addressed.

The USA, Italy, China and the UK had the most published COVID-19 nutrition research published in the literature, accounting for 55.12% of all publications in the study. Although no bibliometric study on COVID-19 nutrition research has been published, Nemours studies have been conducted on COVID-19 research productivity in various fields [18, 20,21,22,23,24,25, 47,48,49,50], as measured by publications, and found that the USA, the UK, China and Europe were the top producers of COVID-19 publications during this time.

Three main research themes in COVID-19 nutrition research were recognized based on the analysis of terms and specified fields of research interest. This analysis found the most common terms in the scientific literature and showed how they occurred in several publications. ‘Changes in diet patterns during the COVID-19 epidemic and its consequences’ as a theme were among the main hot topics in the current study. During the pandemic, the frequency with which people consumed different types of food decreased [51]. There was also a decrease in physical activity and an increase in sedentary behavior [51]. During pandemic-induced lockdown or quarantine, social isolation had a more severe impact on nutritional status [52]. COVID-19 has had a great influence on some communities [53,54,55,56], leading them to change their dietary habits. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the influence of social isolation and lockdowns on eating patterns should not be ignored, as it has already had acute impacts and will most likely have long-term negative consequences for public health. Poor dietary habits that are continued over time will increase plasma risk factors for cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cancer [57, 58].

Another subject that has received a lot of attention during the COVID-19 epidemic is food security. Maintaining the security of our food supply and having quick access to adequate amounts of safe food is of key importance to all people during this pandemic is one of the most significant problems for the food system. The pandemic may have had an impact on global food security [16, 59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69]. Food security is a key component of the 2030 Agenda for the Sustainable Development Goals, which seek to eradicate poverty and protect the environment [7]. Delays in food delivery, loss of food quality and quantity, limitations in food access, and income shortages to purchase food have all occurred in third-world nations. This has immediate health consequences, and given the detrimental effects of previous pandemics on human growth and health, it is reasonable to expect that the present COVID-19 pandemic will cause nutritional deficiencies around the world, with long-term consequences for human health [57]. Furthermore, COVID-19 has emphasized the need for early diagnosis of novel infectious diseases, 70% of which originate in animals. Improving the surveillance systems for zoonotic diseases resulting from animals used in the food chain is critical to preventing future disasters [16].

Another hot topic is the determinants and COVID-19 outcomes. In reviewing the literature, several articles hypothesize that a balanced diet could help reduce the prevalence of COVID-19 infection and alleviate its clinical symptoms [10, 70,71,72,73,74]. Nutrients such as vitamins, zinc, and fibers should be consumed to boost immunity through their antioxidant activities or anti-inflammatory effects [13]. Although the risk of infection and the severity of clinical symptoms may be influenced by the food a person eats, it is not possible to completely avoid viral transmission by maintaining a healthy diet or using dietary supplements. More studies are needed to understand the effect of vitamin D and zinc levels in patients with COVID-19 patients on viral transmission and their clinical symptoms [57].

Citation analysis is one of the most significant methods for determining the effect of an article's effect or reflecting its recognition. Analyzing the best-cited publications can show which research topics have got the greatest attention from the scientific community [75]. Those interested in becoming experts in nutrition and COVID-19 research should familiarize themselves with the top-cited publications. The most cited article was by Di Renzo et al. [14] and published in the Journal of Translational Medicine. This Italian study was conducted to characterize the modifications that occurred in the lifestyles and eating behaviors of Italians during the COVID-19 pandemic. Approximately half of the sample perceived the concept of weight gain. Few participants stopped smoking and increased their physical activities. However, more than 38 percent committed to Mediterranean foods, especially in the age category of 18–30 years.

The second most cited article was by Ammar et al. [2] and was published in Nutrients. This international study, which included patients from all over the world, outlined that house arrest had a negative impact on people’s lifestyles during the COVID-19 pandemic, which included, but was not limited to, reducing all types of physical activity and increasing the consumption of unhealthy diets. The third most cited article was by Barazzoni et al. [44] and was published in Clinical Nutrition. In this study, the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) provided ten instructions to properly help physicians manage diet status in patients with coronavirus infection, particularly the elderly, patients with multimorbidity and those who require an intensive care unit. The fourth most cited article was by Calder et al. [11] and was published in Nutrients. This article summarized that there are enough essential vitamins and minerals to strengthen the immune system, which is necessary to combat COVID-19. It also concluded that these supplements are cheap, efficient, and without harm.

The fifth most cited article was by Galanakis [5] and published in Foods. This study focused on the challenges of food systems during the COVID-19 pandemic; creating a new system to reduce the cost of foods and make them sustainable. In addition, the researchers said that food should be provided with healthy nutritious substances that maintain immune function. The sixth most cited article was by Hobbs [45] and published in the Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics. This study participated to talk about the challenges facing the supply chain system during the COVID-19 crisis. Importantly, the authors are advised to keep this system flexible and implement a plan to prevent damage of this model. At the same time, it has to maintain the supply of food for the highly susceptible population (i.e., poor people) and avoid stock shortages. The seventh most cited article was by Sidor and was Rzymski [15] and published in Nutrients. In this article, the authors reported on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on eating habits. They found that people who were overweight or obese were more likely to have bad habits, such as increased food consumption, gain weight, and low commitment to healthy diets (i.e., fruits).

The eighth most cited article was by Butler and Barrientos [10] and published in Brain Behavior and Immunity. This article highlighted the effects of nutritional habits on the vulnerability of COVID-19 and the outcomes that would occur in the long run. Clearly, Western pattern nutrition, which consists of saturated lipids, sweets, and processed carbohydrates, can negatively affect the immune function and weaken its ability to invade viruses, such as coronavirus. The ninth most cited article was by Muscogiuri et al. [17] and published in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. This study concluded that individuals should implement numerous tactics in their daily lifestyle and eating habits during the COVID-19 lockdown, aiming to avoid unhealthy diet behaviors (i.e., managing the amount and time of eating and snaking). The tenth most cited article was by Zabetakis et al. [12] and was published in Nutrients. A section of this article focused on the diet style that people should follow during the COVID-19 pandemic to maintain a healthy immune system and likely prevent infection. Individuals should choose foods rich in vitamins and healthy ingredients, such as Mediterranean foods, and avoid a Western diet pattern.

Strengths and limitations

Unlike previous systematic analyzes and reviews, this is the first study to quantitatively and intuitively evaluate scientific papers on nutrition of COVID-19 published during the early phases of the pandemic and as such, it will be a useful reference for academics in this field. However, there were some limitations because we opted to limit the nutrition search to the titles of the publications rather than the abstracts. The search query was created to retrieve all potentially relevant papers in the field of nutrition and COVID-19. However, there is a risk of false positive or false-negative findings exists. Otherwise, the sample may include less representative publications that are not specifically about COVID-19 and nutrition. Furthermore, the bibliometric analysis in the current study is limited to nutrition- and COVID-19-related publications found in the Scopus database. Although Scopus is often regarded the most comprehensive and accurate database of publications and citations, it may not contain the entire collection of COVID-19 research. Other databases, such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, might have offered additional insights that were not available in this investigation. Furthermore, the number of citations and the number of publications will fluctuate over time due to the short period following the start of the pandemic and the ever-changing presence of COVID-19 research. In addition to that, numerous recently published, high-quality articles were unable to garner enough citations to be included in the list of the top ten most cited papers list. As a result, publications published in the most recent year (that is, 2021) were not included in this list, although this does not imply that those articles are less significant. Lastly, because the online Scopus database is constantly updated, there is some variation between our bibliometric results and the real findings. In this regard, new studies are still being published and a number of new studies are likely to appear in the coming months.

Conclusions

This bibliographic study gives a general overview of publications related to nutrition and covid-19. Most publications were conducted in the USA and Italy, and Nutrients being the most popular source of articles. This study sheds light on the growth and development of nutrition and covid-19-related research and should contribute to the expansion of the global frontier in the major hot topics, including “food security in the COVID-19 pandemic”; “nutritional determinants and COVID-19 outcomes”; and “changes in diet habits during the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences”. Understanding the growth of developing scientific knowledge on COVID-19 nutrition research, for example, is useful not only for the scientific community but also for evidence-based policymakers and nutritionists at the global level to improve the efficiency of future studies and better understand the role of diet and nutrition in COVID-19 to properly address the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic's consequences.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available upon request from the corresponding author (saedzyoud@yahoo.com).

Abbreviations

Ifs:

Impact factors

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease 2019

SDGs:

Sustainable development goals

MeSH:

Medical subject headings

References

  1. Park JJH, Mogg R, Smith GE, Nakimuli-Mpungu E, Jehan F, Rayner CR, Condo J, Decloedt EH, Nachega JB, Reis G, et al. How COVID-19 has fundamentally changed clinical research in global health. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(5):e711–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ammar A, Brach M, Trabelsi K, Chtourou H, Boukhris O, Masmoudi L, Bouaziz B, Bentlage E, How D, Ahmed M et al. Effects of COVID-19 home confinement on eating behaviour and physical activity: results of the ECLB-COVID19 international online survey. Nutrients 2020;12(6).

  3. Headey D, Heidkamp R, Osendarp S, Ruel M, Scott N, Black R, Shekar M, Bouis H, Flory A, Haddad L, et al. Impacts of COVID-19 on childhood malnutrition and nutrition-related mortality. The Lancet. 2020;396(10250):519–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hobbs JE. Food supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic. Can J Agric Econ/Revue canadienne d’agroeconomie. 2020;68(2):171–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Galanakis CM. The food systems in the era of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic crisis. Foods. 2020;9(4):523.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Birgisdottir BE. Nutrition is key to global pandemic resilience. BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2020;3(2):129–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. United Nations. The sustainable development goals report. 2019. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2019/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2019.pdf (Accessed 10 Jul 2021).

  8. Schwingshackl L, Hoffmann G. Diet quality as assessed by the healthy eating index, the alternate healthy eating index, the dietary approaches to stop hypertension score, and health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115(5):780–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sofi F, Macchi C, Abbate R, Gensini GF, Casini A. Mediterranean diet and health status: an updated meta-analysis and a proposal for a literature-based adherence score. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17(12):2769–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Butler MJ, Barrientos RM. The impact of nutrition on COVID-19 susceptibility and long-term consequences. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;87:53–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Calder P, Carr A, Gombart A, Eggersdorfer M. Optimal nutritional status for a well-functioning immune system is an important factor to protect against viral infections. Nutrients. 2020;12(4):1181. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12041181.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Zabetakis I, Lordan R, Norton C, Tsoupras A. COVID-19: the inflammation link and the role of nutrition in potential mitigation. Nutrients. 2020;12(5):1466. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12051466.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Iddir M, Brito A, Dingeo G, Del Campo SSFD, Samouda H, La Frano MR, Bohn T. Strengthening the immune system and reducing inflammation and oxidative stress through diet and nutrition: considerations during the COVID-19 crisis. Nutrients. 2020;12(6):1562. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12061562.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Di Renzo L, Gualtieri P, Pivari F, Soldati L, Attina A, Cinelli G, Leggeri C, Caparello G, Barrea L, Scerbo F, et al. Eating habits and lifestyle changes during COVID-19 lockdown: an Italian survey. J Transl Med. 2020;18(1):229.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sidor A, Rzymski P. Dietary choices and habits during COVID-19 lockdown: experience from Poland. Nutrients. 2020;12(6):1657. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12061657.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Laborde D, Martin W, Swinnen J, Vos R. COVID-19 risks to global food security. Science. 2020;369(6503):500–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Muscogiuri G, Barrea L, Savastano S, Colao A. Nutritional recommendations for CoVID-19 quarantine. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020;74(6):850–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Soytas RB. A bibliometric analysis of publications on COVID-19 and older adults. Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2021;25(3):197–203. https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.21.0060.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang Q, Huang R. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on sustainable development goals – a survey. Environ Res. 2021;202:111637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111637.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Pasin O, Pasin T. A bibliometric analysis of rheumatology and COVID-19 researches. Clin Rheumatol. 2021; 1–6.

  21. Al-Jabi SW. Current global research landscape on COVID-19 and depressive disorders: bibliometric and visualization analysis. World J Psychiatry. 2021;11(6):253–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kalra G, Kaur R, Ichhpujani P, Chahal R, Kumar S. COVID-19 and ophthalmology: a scientometric analysis. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69(5):1234–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jacimovic J, Jakovljevic A, Nagendrababu V, Duncan HF, Dummer PMH. A bibliometric analysis of the dental scientific literature on COVID-19. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(11):6171–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03916-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Corrales-Reyes IE, Hernández-García F, Mejia CR. COVID-19 and diabetes: analysis of the scientific production indexed in Scopus. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021;15(3):765–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zyoud SH, Zyoud AH. Coronavirus disease-19 in environmental fields: a bibliometric and visualization mapping analysis. Environ Dev Sustain. 2020;23(6):8895–923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01004-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Agarwal A, Durairajanayagam D, Tatagari S, Esteves SC, Harlev A, Henkel R, Roychoudhury S, Homa S, Puchalt NG, Ramasamy R, et al. Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(2):296–309.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22(2):338–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kulkarni AV, Aziz B, Shams I, Busse JW. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA. 2009;302(10):1092–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Aristovnik A, Ravšelj D, Umek L. A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 across science and social science research landscape. Sustainability. 2020;12(21):9132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Furstenau LB, Rabaioli B, Sott MK, Cossul D, Bender MS, De Mattos Farina EMJ, Filho FNB, Severo PP, Dohan MS, Bragazzi NL. A bibliometric network analysis of coronavirus during the first eight months of COVID-19 in 2020. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(3):952. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030952.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Cernile G, Heritage T, Sebire NJ, Gordon B, Schwering T, Kazemlou S, Borecki Y. Network graph representation of COVID-19 scientific publications to aid knowledge discovery. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021;28(1):e100254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zyoud SH. The Arab region’s contribution to global COVID-19 research: bibliometric and visualization analysis. Global Health. 2021;17(1):31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Martinez-Perez C, Alvarez-Peregrina C, Villa-Collar C, Sánchez-Tena MÁ. Citation network analysis of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(20):7690. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207690.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang J, Hong N. The COVID-19 research landscape: Measuring topics and collaborations using scientific literature. Medicine. 2020;99(43): e22849.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Guleid FH, Oyando R, Kabia E, Mumbi A, Akech S, Barasa E. A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research in Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(5):e005690. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005690.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW. Mapping the situation of research on coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): a preliminary bibliometric analysis during the early stage of the outbreak. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):561.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Al-Jabi SW. Current global research landscape on COVID-19 and depressive disorders: bibliometric and visualization analysis. World J Psychiatr. 2021;11(6):253–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. James PT, Ali Z, Armitage AE, Bonell A, Cerami C, Drakesmith H, Jobe M, Jones KS, Liew Z, Moore SE, et al. The role of nutrition in COVID-19 susceptibility and severity of disease: a systematic review. J Nutr. 2021;151(7):1854–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Neira C, Godinho R, Rincon F, Mardones R, Pedroso J. Consequences of the COVID-19 syndemic for nutritional health: a systematic review. Nutrients. 2021;13(4):1168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Abate SM, Chekole YA, Estifanos MB, Abate KH, Kabthymer RH. Prevalence and outcomes of malnutrition among hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021;43:174–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Damayanthi H, Prabani KIP. Nutritional determinants and COVID-19 outcomes of older patients with COVID-19: a systematic review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021;95: 104411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics. 2017;111(2):1053–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Barazzoni R, Bischoff SC, Breda J, Wickramasinghe K, Krznaric Z, Nitzan D, Pirlich M, Singer P. ESPEN expert statements and practical guidance for nutritional management of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clin Nutr. 2020;39(6):1631–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Hobbs JE. Food supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic. Can J Agric Econ. 2020;68(2):171–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Alwan NA, Burgess RA, Ashworth S, Beale R, Bhadelia N, Bogaert D, Dowd J, Eckerle I, Goldman LR, Greenhalgh T, et al. Scientific consensus on the COVID-19 pandemic: we need to act now. Lancet. 2020;396(10260):e71–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Ahmad T, Murad MA, Baig M, Hui J. Research trends in COVID-19 vaccine: a bibliometric analysis. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021;17:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Chen Y, Cheng L, Lian R, Song Z, Tian J. COVID-19 vaccine research focusses on safety, efficacy, immunoinformatics, and vaccine production and delivery: a bibliometric analysis based on VOSviewer. Biosci Trends. 2021;15(2):64–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mohaimenul Islam M, Poly TN, Alsinglawi B, Lin L-F, Chien S-C, Liu J-C, Jian W-S. Application of artificial intelligence in COVID-19 pandemic: bibliometric analysis. Healthcare. 2021;9(4):441. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9040441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Gul S, Rehman SU, Ashiq M, Khattak A. Mapping the scientific literature on COVID-19 and mental health. Psychiatr Danub. 2020;32(3–4):463–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bertrand L, Shaw KA, Ko J, Deprez D, Chilibeck PD, Zello GA. The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on university students’ dietary intake, physical activity, and sedentary behaviour. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2021;46(3):265–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Visser M, Schaap LA, Wijnhoven HAH. Self-reported impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on nutrition and physical activity behaviour in dutch older adults living independently. Nutrients. 2020;12(12):3708. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12123708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Pfeifer D, Resetar J, Gajdos Kljusuric J, Panjkota Krbavcic I, Vranesic Bender D, Rodriguez-Perez C, Ruiz-Lopez MD, Satalic Z. Cooking at home and adherence to the mediterranean diet during the COVID-19 confinement: the experience from the croatian COVIDiet study. Front Nutr. 2021;8(102): 617721.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Huber BC, Steffen J, Schlichtiger J, Graupe T, Deuster E, Strouvelle V, Fischer MR, Massberg S, Brunner S. Alteration of physical activity during COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in young adults. J Transl Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02591-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Amatori S, Zeppa SD, Preti A, Gervasi M, Gobbi E, Ferrini F, Rocchi MBL, Baldari C, Perroni F, Piccoli G, Stocchi V, Sestili P, Sisti D. Dietary habits and psychological states during COVID-19 home isolation in Italian College students: the role of physical exercise. Nutrients. 2020;12(12):3660. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12123660.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Zarah AB, Enriquez-Marulanda J, Andrade JM. Relationship between dietary habits, food attitudes and food security status among adults living within the United States three months post-mandated quarantine: a cross-sectional study. Nutrients. 2020;12(11):3468. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12113468.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Rodriguez-Leyva D, Pierce GN. The impact of nutrition on the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on nutrition. Nutrients. 2021;13(6):1752. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13061752.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Iaccarino Idelson P, Rendina D, Strazzullo P. Nutrition and the Covid-19 pandemic: three factors with high impact on community health. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2021;31(3):756–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Arndt C, Davies R, Gabriel S, Harris L, Makrelov K, Robinson S, Levy S, Simbanegavi W, van Seventer D, Anderson L. Covid-19 lockdowns, income distribution, and food security: an analysis for South Africa. Glob Food Sec. 2020;26: 100410.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Boyacι-Gündüz CP, Ibrahim SA, Wei OC, Galanakis CM. Transformation of the food sector: security and resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Foods. 2021;10(3):497. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10030497.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Cable J, Jaykus LA, Hoelzer K, Newton J, Torero M. The impact of COVID-19 on food systems, safety, and security-a symposium report. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2021;1484(1):3–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Lal R. Home gardening and urban agriculture for advancing food and nutritional security in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Food Sec. 2020;12(4):871–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-020-01058-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Mardones FO, Rich KM, Boden LA, Moreno-Switt AI, Caipo ML, Zimin-Veselkoff N, Alateeqi AM, Baltenweck I. The COVID-19 pandemic and global food security. Front Vet Sci. 2020;7: 578508.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Mayasari NR, Ho DKN, Lundy DJ, Skalny AV, Tinkov AA, Teng IC, Wu MC, Faradina A, Mohammed AZM, Park JM, et al. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on food security and diet-related lifestyle behaviors: an analytical study of google trends-based query volumes. Nutrients. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12103103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Paslakis G, Dimitropoulos G, Katzman DK. A call to action to address COVID-19-induced global food insecurity to prevent hunger, malnutrition, and eating pathology. Nutr Rev. 2021;79(1):114–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Rivington M, King R, Duckett D, Iannetta P, Benton TG, Burgess PJ, Hawes C, Wellesley L, Polhill JG, Aitkenhead M, et al. UK food and nutrition security during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Nutr Bull. 2021;46(1):88–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Soldavini J, Andrew H, Berner M. Characteristics associated with changes in food security status among college students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Transl Behav Med. 2021;11(2):295–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Udmale P, Pal I, Szabo S, Pramanik M, Large A. Global food security in the context of COVID-19: a scenario-based exploratory analysis. Prog Disaster Sci. 2020;7: 100120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Woertz E. Wither the self-sufficiency illusion? Food security in Arab Gulf States and the impact of COVID-19. Food Sec. 2020;12:1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Bold J, Harris M, Fellows L, Chouchane M. Nutrition, the digestive system and immunity in COVID-19 infection. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2020;13(4):331–40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Mossink JP. Zinc as nutritional intervention and prevention measure for COVID-19 disease. BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2020;3(1):111–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. McAuliffe S, Ray S, Fallon E, Bradfield J, Eden T, Kohlmeier M. Dietary micronutrients in the wake of COVID-19: an appraisal of evidence with a focus on high-risk groups and preventative healthcare. BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2020;3(1):93–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Paoli A, Gorini S, Caprio M. The dark side of the spoon - glucose, ketones and COVID-19: A possible role for ketogenic diet? J Transl Med. 2020;18(1):441.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Sahin E, Orhan C, Uckun FM, Sahin K. Clinical Impact potential of supplemental nutrients as adjuncts of therapy in high-risk COVID-19 for obese patients. Front Nutr. 2020;7: 580504.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Zhu S, Meng H, Gu Z, Zhao Y. Research trend of nanoscience and nanotechnology – a bibliometric analysis of nano today. Nano Today. 2021;39: 101233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was obtained for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Poison Control and Drug Information Center (PCDIC), College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, 44839, Palestine

    Sa’ed H. Zyoud

  2. Department of Clinical and Community Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, 44839, Palestine

    Sa’ed H. Zyoud, Samah W. Al-Jabi & Amer Koni

  3. Clinical Research Centre, An-Najah National University Hospital, Nablus, 44839, Palestine

    Sa’ed H. Zyoud

  4. Division of Clinical Pharmacy, Hematology and Oncology Pharmacy Department, An-Najah National University Hospital, Nablus, 44839, Palestine

    Amer Koni

  5. Department of Nutrition, An-Najah National University Hospital, Nablus, 44839, Palestine

    Muna Shakhshir

  6. College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates

    Moyad Shahwan

  7. Health and Safety Department, Dubai Municipality, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

    Ammar A. Jairoun

Authors
  1. Sa’ed H. Zyoud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Samah W. Al-Jabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amer Koni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Muna Shakhshir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Moyad Shahwan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ammar A. Jairoun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SK conceived and designed the study, provided critical contextual, theoretical, and methodological guidance and expertise, collected the data, analyzed the data, generated figures, made major contributions to the existing literature search and interpretation of the manuscript, and drafted the manuscript; AK, MS, AJ, MSS and SA were involved in interpretation of the data, contributed to the manuscript writing, and made revisions to the initial draft; all authors provided a critical review and approved the final manuscript before submission. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sa’ed H. Zyoud.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

There was no need for ethical approval because the data for the bibliometric research were extracted directly from the database without further human intervention.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zyoud, S.H., Al-Jabi, S.W., Koni, A. et al. Mapping the landscape and structure of global research on nutrition and COVID-19: visualization analysis. J Health Popul Nutr 41, 25 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-022-00304-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-022-00304-y

Keywords

Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition

ISSN: 2072-1315

Contact us