Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

The association between academic performance indicators and lifestyle behaviors among Kuwaiti college students

Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition volume 42, Article number: 27 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Lifestyle behaviors are developed during young adulthood and carried through life. Accordingly, early detection of unhealthy behaviors can help prevent the increase in non-communicable diseases in the population. College students are an especially vulnerable group who, upon entering a new environment, tend to engage in unhealthy behaviors.

Objective

The present study aims to evaluate the lifestyle behaviors of Kuwaiti college students and their association with markers of academic achievements.

Methods

One thousand two hundred fifty-nine students participated in the present study and answered an online questionnaire pertaining to their sociodemographic status, academic performance indicators, body weight and height, and lifestyle behaviors. Data were collected from November 2020 to February 2021.

Results

Results of the present study showed that obesity was significantly more prevalent among male participants than among females even though males were more physically active. Alternatively, females had a greater grade point average in college, slept more, and had more screen time. Interestingly, we were unable to detect a significant correlation between lifestyle behaviors and academic achievements.

Conclusion

The observed differences in body mass index between genders may have been attributed to energy intake rather than energy expenditure.

Introduction

Lifestyle behaviors, such as eating habits, sleeping patterns, and physical activity, are daily practices that are molded by a combination of individual choices and social, cultural, and economic factors [1, 2]. World Health Organization (WHO) has recognized unhealthy lifestyles as a major cause of illness, mainly non-communicable diseases, and death [3, 4]. As such, monitoring lifestyles and implementing healthy behaviors in communities are of paramount importance. Interestingly, more often than not, behavioral patterns we established as young adults are carried through life, which makes college students a group of interest [5].

College marks a time of critical changes, where students have to adapt to a new environment and handle newfound responsibilities [6]. To cope with the transition, some students tend to engage in unhealthy behaviors such as physical inactivity [7,8,9], skipping breakfast [10, 11] poor diets [12, 13], sleep deprivation [14], etc. Several studies have documented the negative effects of unhealthy behavior, whereby 40% of premature deaths in the USA were reported to be attributed to unhealthy lifestyles [15].

Lifestyle behaviors are known to be influenced by several sociodemographic factors. Many studies investigated the relationship between gender and behavioral patterns [16,17,18]. Additionally, lifestyle behaviors were reported to vary between people of various economic statuses, in which those of lower income were shown to be engaged in more unhealthy lifestyle practices [19, 20].

In addition to unhealthy behaviors, the process of transition to college is usually accompanied by additional stress for students [21,22,23]. Stress stemming from college life can affect the academic performance of students [24, 25], which may subsequently influence their futures post-graduation [26]. Concurrently, academic performance in certain fields of study was shown to be affected by sociodemographic factors, such as gender [27, 28] and socioeconomic status [29,30,31]. Similarly, weight/diets and lifestyle behaviors seem to affect students’ academic standing [14, 32,33,34,35]. To our knowledge, limited information is available on the relationship between lifestyle behaviors and markers of academic performance among Kuwaiti students. Accordingly, it would be interesting to assess the impact of these factors on Kuwaiti college students. Thus, a study was designed in an attempt to assess the effect of some sociodemographic factors, i.e., gender and geographic location, as well as weight on lifestyle behaviors and academic achievements of Kuwaiti college students.

Materials and methods

A cross-sectional online study was performed, from November 2020 to February 2021, by approaching college students from various governorates across Kuwait. Ethical approval to perform the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the College of Health Sciences in Kuwait. Consenting students, who wished to participate in the study, were asked to fill out an online questionnaire.

The questionnaire was composed of several parts. One part focused on the sociodemographic status by including questions on gender, weight, height, marital status, governorate, and name of the college they were attending. As well as, their Grade Point Average (GPA) in college, which is the most common measure of academic performance, and their high school grade, which is usually expressed in percentages. Another part focused on the lifestyle behaviors of students and included questions about physical activity (22 questions), breakfast intake (1 question), sleeping habits (2 questions), and screen time (2 questions). The questionnaires were previously validated for adolescents and young people and were published elsewhere [36,37,38,39].

Students were also asked to enter their self-reported weight (Kg) and height (cm), and data were used for the calculation of Body-Mass index (BMI). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) BMI cutoff reference standards were used to classify underweight, normal weight, and overweight or obesity relative to the adult’s age [40].

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS V.25 (Chicago, Illinois, United States). Descriptive statistics were performed on the anthropometric characteristics of the participants, and data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or as percentages (Table 1). Additionally, independent t test (for continuous dichotomous variables) and Chi-square test (for categorical variables) were used to assess significant differences among means relative to gender (Tables 1 and 2). Pearson correlation was used to correlate between lifestyle behaviors and high school grades and GPA. Due to the differences between genders for the measured parameters, a separate correlation was performed according to gender (Table 3). One-way ANOVA was performed to assess variations in the measured parameters for participants from different districts (Additional file 1: Table S1). Statistical significance was set at a p value < 0.05.

Table 1 Self-reported anthropometric characteristics of the participants
Full size table
Table 2 Self-reported academic performance indicators and lifestyle behaviors among Kuwaiti college students
Full size table
Table 3 Pearson correlation coefficients for selected variables with high school grade and college GPA
Full size table

Results

A total of 1259 students participated in the study and their basic reported anthropometric characteristics data are presented in Table 1. The number and percentage of female participants were significantly higher than those of males (54.2% females vs 45% males; p value = 0.003), but the age of participants was similar between genders at about 21.5 years. The majority of participants (~ 90%) were not married (single), and no significant differences were detected between genders. The mean BMI of the participants was about 25, in which that femals was significantly lower than that of males (P ˂0.001), this was mainly attributed to the high prevalence of obesity among males (23.3%) as compared to female (13.2%) participants (p = 0.003). It is worth mentioning that about 9% of participants suffered from being underweight.

Indicators of academic performance in relation to lifestyle behaviors are presented in Table 2. The average high school grade was similar between genders at about 75%, while college GPA was reported to be significantly higher (p = 0.041) for female (3.1 ± 0.6) as compared to male (2.9 ± 0.6) participants. The frequency (day/week) of breakfast intake was about 4 days/week, which was similar between genders. Total physical activity expressed as metabolic equivalents (METs) (hours/week) was reported to be significantly higher (p˂0.001) among male compared to female participants by about 10 METs (hours/week). In contrast, screen time of females was significantly higher (p˂0.001) than that of males by about 1 h per day, and sleep duration, expressed as hours per night, was reported to be modestly, though significantly (p = 0.039), higher by about 0.2 h per night in female participants.

The partial correlation coefficients between markers of academic performance and selected lifestyle factors are presented in Table 3. High school grades and college GPA did not significantly correlate with BMI. Likewise, the selected lifestyle factors, i.e., breakfast intake, total physical activity, sleep duration, and screen time, were not significantly correlated with the markers of academic performance (high school grade and college GPA).

Pearson’s correlation relative to gender reflected similar results. Although most measured variables showed a significant difference relative to gender, no significant correlation was detected between BMI, breakfast intake, physical activity, and screen time on one hand and high school grade and GPA on the other hand. Interestingly, the sleep duration of females was significantly and negatively correlated with their high school grades (p = 0.034) but not their college GPA.

Variations in academic achievements, BMI, and lifestyle behaviors across districts are presented in Table 1 (supplementary material). Results show that academic achievements varied significantly among districts. The high school grades of students in the Hawalli district (77.8 ± 10.1%) were significantly greater than the grades of students from the other districts (p value = 0.005). Similarly, college GPA of students in Hawalli district (3.1 ± 0.6) was significantly greater than the GPA of students in Al Jahraa (2.9 ± 0.6). Concurrently, there were no significant variations in BMI, breakfast intake, total physical activity, and screen time among districts (p value ˃ 0.05). Conversely, the sleep duration of students in Al Jahraa (7.6 ± 1.5 h/night) was significantly greater than that of students in Mubarak Al Kabir (7.1 ± 1.6 h/night).

Discussion

Kuwait, a country in Western Asia, has benefitted from impressive economic growth in the past few decades with a 2.47% annual growth rate in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) from 1963 until 2020 [41]. Unfortunately, the economic development was paralleled with a drastic change in many lifestyle practices in a manner mimicking that of Western countries. This was highly pronounced by the adoption of a sedentary lifestyle, consumption of fast food, etc. Such changes in lifestyle behaviors are thought to affect all segments of the population including college students and it is not clear whether the changes in lifestyle behaviors had impacted academic performance.

In the present study, a high prevalence of overweight and obesity was reported. These results are in line with others [42,43,44] in which a high rate of overweight and obesity was reported among the Kuwaiti population. The observed high rate of obesity among male participants is in line with others [45], in which the rate of normal weight and overweight statuses was more prominent in Kuwaiti female college students whereas obesity was more abundant in males. Even though traditionally, plumpness was valued in Arab countries and considered a feminine trait [46], female college students are believed to have been influenced by the widely propagated images advertising thin models as the “perfect type” and are thus becoming more conscious of their weights. In line, women at a young age were reported to be very cautious about their body image and are likely to participate in weight loss or control activities [46, 47]. However, the observed low physical activity and increased screen time among women imply that their weight control measures are mainly related to dieting (reduction in energy intake) rather than increased physical activity (increase in energy expenditure). Future studies should focus on investigating the eating habits of Kuwaiti college students relative to gender.

Levels of overweight and obesity statuses exceeded those reported among university students in European countries [48]. Al-Isa [49] noted that while in Europe societal norms pressure people to remain thin, Kuwaiti people seem to accept obesity in the absence of societal penalties against fatness. El Ghazali, Ibrahim [50] attributed high BMIs among Kuwaiti college students to several factors (including consumption of sweets and adopting sedentary lifestyles) and noted that the regular consumption of fast food seems to be the most important factor. Not to mention that traditional Arab clothing helps hide the body shape and thus might play a role in altering the perceived body type and making students less interested in monitoring their weights.

In support, physical activity among university students in Saudi Arabia [51] and the USA [52] found that male students were more physically active than females. Although male students spent more time being physically active, they were also more obese while more females had a normal weight (Table 2). These results suggest that the difference in weight between the two genders is highly attributed to eating habits rather than physical activity. Interestingly, an often-overlooked problem is that 8.7% of the students are underweight, a classic case of the coexistence between obesity and undernutrition. This may relate to the pocket of extreme poverty or some form of disturbed eating behaviors and requires further investigation to address this serious issue.

Correlation analysis showed no differences in markers of academic performance among participants of varied BMI in both genders. The relation between BMI and academic performance is far from clear. Some studies reported an inverse relationship between BMI and academic performance [33, 53, 54], while others failed to detect any relationships [55, 56]. The relation may be confounded by several factors including weight-related psychological factors such as having low self-esteem; depression (caused by weight-biased treatment), etc. Factors are known to affect the academic performance of the students thus leading to lower academic performance.

Likewise, the relation between breakfast intake and academic performance is far from clear [57], though a positive relation was commonly reported. The inconsistency between studies may partially relate to the nutritional composition of the consumed breakfast. Thus, the failure to detect a relationship between breakfast intake and markers of academic performance may in part relate to the nutritional composition of the ingested breakfast. Therefore, future studies should focus on assessing the nutritional composition of breakfast among participants.

Moreover, physical activity is thought to improve cognitive function and brain structure and function [58]. However, its impact on academic performance is controversial and is confounded by several factors including the type, intensity, setting, etc. [59]. For instance, moderate physical activity performed during school hours seem to positively impact academic performance. The questionnaire from the present study was not detailed enough to capture the aforementioned factors and this may have been behind the failure to detect a significant correlation between physical activity and markers of academic performance. Future studies should give attention to details related to the varied aspects of physical activities to clarify any potential relationship.

Several studies have reported an inverse relationship between screen time and academic performance [60]. However, the present study failed to detect a significant correlation between these variables. It is important to note that this questionnaire did not differentiate between screen time spent on schoolwork and screen time spent relaxing and having fun. Whatever, a positive trend was observed although failed to reach statistical significance.

On the other hand, although the relationship between sleep duration and academic performance is extensively studied, the results remain to be non-conclusive. For instance, a review by Musshafen, Tyrone [61] reported that academic performance is correlated with sleep quality but not sleep duration. While, Dewald, Meijer [62] reported a moderate yet significant association between sleep duration, quality, sleepiness, and academic performance. Additionally, a positive association was reported between academic performance, duration, quality, and consistency of sleep patterns [63]. With the exception of females’ high school grades, where a significant negative correlation was observed, the present study failed to detect a significant correlation between sleep duration and academic performance. It is important to note that the only factor considered in the present study was the duration of sleep and that future studies should consider factoring in other variables such as the quality, and consistency of sleeping patterns. Additionally, future studies should look into more consistent methods of evaluating sleeping patterns rather than counting on self-reported data.

Pearson’s correlation was performed to detect a relationship between physical activity, sleep duration, and screen time (data not shown). Interestingly, we failed to detect a correlation between physical activity and sleep duration, which could indicate that the physical activities performed were not of high intensity. Alternatively, screen time was found to be positively correlated with sleep duration (p value ˂ 0.001) and negatively correlated with physical activity (p value ˂ 0.001). The present results suggest that the more time the students are spending on screen time, the more they sleep and the less they are physically active.

Overall, our study found no correlation between lifestyle behaviors and markers of academic achievements (Table 3). Previous studies have highlighted the importance of adopting healthy lifestyles on academic achievements [32, 64]. The observed minimal variation in the markers of academic achievement may have been behind the inability to detect a significant association with the varied component of lifestyle behaviors. Nonetheless, males seem to be more physically active and spend less time watching television (TV) or using social media and computers while females slept more and had a lower BMI.

In an attempt to investigate the effect of geographic location on academic achievements and lifestyle behavior of the participants, we studied these variables relative to the district the participants came from. Although some differences were observed among districts, mainly in academic achievement indicators and sleep duration (Additional file 1: Table S1), the data collected in the questionnaire do not provide enough information to explain the results. We speculate that the variations could be caused by differences in the socioeconomic status, mainly income and occupation, of the participants’ families. Studies have shown that improved socioeconomic status is associated with better academic performance [29,30,31]. Unfortunately, the questionnaire did not include questions about the economic situation of the students and thus no clear-cut conclusions can be made.

The present study showed that in general, Kuwaiti college students adopted healthy lifestyle behaviors, being physically active (34.5 h/ week), sleeping for more than 7 h daily, and spending on average 5.3 h/ day watching TV or using social media. It is worth noting, however, that students should improve their breakfast intake (4 days/ week). Concurrently, the lifestyle behaviors did not seem to affect students’ academic performance. The study also showed that females have a lower BMI than males, which might have positively affected their college GPA; however, more research regarding the eating habits of students should be performed. Regardless of the effect of lifestyle behaviors on academic performance, it is of paramount importance to promote healthy patterns among young adults to help prevent or decrease the occurrence of non-communicable illnesses. Lastly, it is important to note that the present study is not a cohort study and accordingly, longitudinal, observational studies may be needed to better assess the long-term effects of lifestyle behaviors on college students in Kuwait.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. Any additional data will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Bourdieu P. Distinction: a social critique of the judgment of taste: Harvard university press; 1987.

  2. Cockerham WC. The sociology of health behavior and health lifestyles. Handb Med Sociol. 2000;5:159–72.

    Google Scholar 

  3. WHO. The world health report 2002: reducing risks, promoting healthy life. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002. Report No.: 9241562072.

  4. WHO. Good health starts with healthy behaviour. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2011.

  5. Schmidt M. Predictors of self-rated health and lifestyle behaviours in Swedish university students. Global J Health Sci. 2012;4(4):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kwan MY, Cairney J, Faulkner GE, Pullenayegum EE. Physical activity and other health-risk behaviors during the transition into early adulthood: a longitudinal cohort study. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(1):14–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Keating XD, Guan J, Piñero JC, Bridges DM. A meta-analysis of college students’ physical activity behaviors. J Am Coll Health. 2005;54(2):116–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Greene GW, Schembre SM, White AA, Hoerr SL, Lohse B, Shoff S, et al. Identifying clusters of college students at elevated health risk based on eating and exercise behaviors and psychosocial determinants of body weight. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(3):394–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Musaiger AO, Awadhalla MS, Al-Mannai M, AlSawad M, Asokan G. Dietary habits and sedentary behaviors among health science university students in Bahrain. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2017;29(2).

  10. Fujii H, Nakano T, Muto T, Aikawa K. Skipping breakfast is associated with poor vegetable intake among college students in Japan. Dokkyo J Med Sci. 2010.

  11. Sun J, Yi H, Liu Z, Wu Y, Bian J, Wu Y, et al. Factors associated with skipping breakfast among Inner Mongolia Medical students in China. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sira N, Pawlak R. Prevalence of overweight and obesity, and dieting attitudes among Caucasian and African American college students in Eastern North Carolina: a cross-sectional survey. Nutr Res Pract. 2010;4(1):36–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hilger J, Loerbroks A, Diehl K. Eating behaviour of university students in Germany: dietary intake, barriers to healthy eating and changes in eating behaviour since the time of matriculation. Appetite. 2017;109:100–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pilcher JJ, Walters AS. How sleep deprivation affects psychological variables related to college students’ cognitive performance. J Am Coll Health. 1997;46(3):121–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA. 2004;291(10):1238–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stock C, Wille L, Krämer A. Gender-specific health behaviors of German university students predict the interest in campus health promotion. Health Promot Int. 2001;16(2):145–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson RL. Gender differences in health-promoting lifestyles of African Americans. Public Health Nurs. 2005;22(2):130–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pengpida S, Peltzera K. Gender differences in health risk behaviour among university students: an international study. Gender Behav. 2015;13(1):6576–83.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stringhini S, Sabia S, Shipley M, Brunner E, Nabi H, Kivimaki M, et al. Association of socioeconomic position with health behaviors and mortality. JAMA. 2010;303(12):1159–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Nandi A, Glymour MM, Subramanian S. Association among socioeconomic status, health behaviors, and all-cause mortality in the United States. Epidemiology. 2014:170–7.

  21. Campbell RL, Svenson LW, Jarvis GK. Perceived level of stress among university undergraduate students in Edmonton, Canada. Percept Motor Skills. 1992;75(2):552–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dyson R, Renk K. Freshmen adaptation to university life: Depressive symptoms, stress, and coping. J Clin Psychol. 2006;62(10):1231–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jou YH, Fukada H. The causes and influence of transitional stress among Chinese students in Japan. J Soc Psychol. 1996;136(4):501–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mehfooz Q, Haider S. Effect of stress on academic performance of undergraduate medical students. J Commun Med Health Educ. 2017;7(6):566.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Maajida Aafreen M, Vishnu Priya V, Gayathri R. Effect of stress on academic performance of students in different streams. Drug Invent Today. 2018;10(9).

  26. Pinto LH, Ramalheira DC. Perceived employability of business graduates: the effect of academic performance and extracurricular activities. J Vocat Behav. 2017;99:165–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wainer H, Steinberg L. Sex differences in performance on the mathematics section of the Scholastic Aptitude Test: A bidirectional validity study. Harv Educ Rev. 1992;62(3):323–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dayioğlu M, Türüt-Aşik S. Gender differences in academic performance in a large public university in Turkey. High Educ. 2007;53(2):255–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Okioga CK. The impact of students’ socio-economic background on academic performance in Universities, a case of students in Kisii University College. Am Int J Soc Sci. 2013;2(2):38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hair NL, Hanson JL, Wolfe BL, Pollak SD. Association of child poverty, brain development, and academic achievement. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(9):822–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Miller P, Votruba-Drzal E, Coley RL. Poverty and academic achievement across the urban to rural landscape: Associations with community resources and stressors. RSF Russell Sage Found J Soc Sci. 2019;5(2):106–22.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wald A, Muennig PA, O’Connell KA, Garber CE. Associations between healthy lifestyle behaviors and academic performance in US undergraduates: a secondary analysis of the American College Health Association’s National College Health Assessment II. Am J Health Promot. 2014;28(5):298–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Anderson AS, Good DJ. Increased body weight affects academic performance in university students. Prev Med Rep. 2017;5:220–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Burrows TL, Whatnall MC, Patterson AJ, Hutchesson MJ. Associations between dietary intake and academic achievement in college students: a systematic review. Healthcare; 2017: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.

  35. Morita N, Nakajima T, Okita K, Ishihara T, Sagawa M, Yamatsu K. Relationships among fitness, obesity, screen time and academic achievement in Japanese adolescents. Physiol Behav. 2016;163:161–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Al-Hazzaa H, Al-Ahmadi M. A self-reported questionnaire for the assessment of physical activity in youth 15–25 years: development, reliability and construct validity. Arab J Food Nutr. 2003;4:279–91.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Al-Hazzaa HM, Abahussain NA, Al-Sobayel HI, Qahwaji DM, Musaiger AO. Physical activity, sedentary behaviors and dietary habits among Saudi adolescents relative to age, gender and region. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Al-Hazzaa HM, Al-Sobayel HI, Musaiger AO. Convergent validity of the Arab Teens Lifestyle Study (ATLS) physical activity questionnaire. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8(9):3810–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Al-Hazzaa HM, Musaiger AO, Group AR. Arab Teens Lifestyle Study (ATLS): objectives, design, methodology and implications. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes Targets Therapy. 2011;4:417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. CDC. Defining adult overweight & obesity: centers for disease control and prevention; 2021 [Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult/defining.html.

  41. TradingEconomics. Kuwait GDP annual growth rate 2021 [Available from: https://tradingeconomics.com/kuwait/gdp-growth-annual.

  42. Elkum N, Al-Arouj M, Sharifi M, Shaltout A, Bennakhi A. Prevalence of childhood obesity in the state of Kuwait. Pediatr Obes. 2016;11(6):e30–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Weiderpass E, Botteri E, Longenecker JC, Alkandari A, Al-Wotayan R, Al Duwairi Q, et al. The prevalence of overweight and obesity in an adult Kuwaiti population in 2014. Front Endocrinol. 2019;10:449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Oguoma VM, Coffee NT, Alsharrah S, Abu-Farha M, Al-Refaei FH, Al-Mulla F, et al. Prevalence of overweight and obesity, and associations with socio-demographic factors in Kuwait. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. AlMajed HT, AlAttar AT, Sadek AA, AlMuaili TA, AlMutairi OA, Shaghouli AS, et al. Prevalence of dyslipidemia and obesity among college students in Kuwait. Alex J of Med. 2011;47(1):67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Khawaja M, Afifi-Soweid R. Images of body weight among young men and women: evidence from Beirut, Lebanon. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2004;58(4):352–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Emslie C, Hunt K, Macintyre S. Perceptions of body image among working men and women. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2001;55(6):406–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Mikolajczyk RT, Maxwell AE, El Ansari W, Stock C, Petkeviciene J, Guillen-Grima F. Relationship between perceived body weight and body mass index based on self-reported height and weight among university students: a cross-sectional study in seven European countries. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Al-Isa AN. Dietary and socio-economic factors associated with obesity among Kuwaiti college men. Br J Nutr. 1999;82(5):369–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. El Ghazali S, Ibrahim JM, Kandari BM, Ismail NA. The relationship between lifestyle and body mass index among university students in Kuwait. Egypt J Commun Med. 2010;28(1):69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Almutairi KM, Alonazi WB, Vinluan JM, Almigbal TH, Batais MA, Alodhayani AA, et al. Health promoting lifestyle of university students in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional assessment. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Fountaine CJ, Liguori GA, Mozumdar A, Schuna JM Jr. Physical activity and screen time sedentary behaviors in college students. Int J Exerc Sci. 2011;4(2):3.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Franz DD, Feresu SA. The relationship between physical activity, body mass index, and academic performance and college-age students. Open J Epidemiol;2013.

  54. Aimé A, Villatte A, Cyr C, Marcotte D. Can weight predict academic performance in college students? An analysis of college women’s self-efficacy, absenteeism, and depressive symptoms as mediators. J Am Coll Health. 2017;65(3):168–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Alswat KA, Al-Shehri AD, Aljuaid TA, Alzaidi BA, Alasmari HD. The association between body mass index and academic performance. Saudi Med J. 2017;38(2):186.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Almarshad F, Mohammed BB. Does bmi affect academic performance? study among undergraduate medical students of Saudi Arabia and India. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2020;9(3):64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hoyland A, Dye L, Lawton CL. A systematic review of the effect of breakfast on the cognitive performance of children and adolescents. Nutr Res Rev. 2009;22(2):220–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Mandolesi L, Polverino A, Montuori S, Foti F, Ferraioli G, Sorrentino P, et al. Effects of physical exercise on cognitive functioning and wellbeing: biological and psychological benefits. Front Psychol. 2018;9:509.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Owen KB, Foley BC, Wilhite K, Booker B, Lonsdale C, Reece LJ. Sport participation and academic performance in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021.

  60. Adelantado-Renau M, Moliner-Urdiales D, Cavero-Redondo I, Beltran-Valls MR, Martínez-Vizcaíno V, Álvarez-Bueno C. Association between screen media use and academic performance among children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(11):1058–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Musshafen LA, Tyrone RS, Abdelaziz A, Sims-Gomillia CE, Pongetti LS, Teng F, et al. Associations between sleep and academic performance in us adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med. 2021.

  62. Dewald JF, Meijer AM, Oort FJ, Kerkhof GA, Bögels SM. The influence of sleep quality, sleep duration and sleepiness on school performance in children and adolescents: a meta-analytic review. Sleep Med Rev. 2010;14(3):179–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Okano K, Kaczmarzyk JR, Dave N, Gabrieli JD, Grossman JC. Sleep quality, duration, and consistency are associated with better academic performance in college students. NPJ Sci Learn. 2019;4(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Pilato IB, Beezhold B, Radnitz C. Diet and lifestyle factors associated with cognitive performance in college students. J Am Coll Health. 2020:1–7.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the College of Health Sciences in Kuwait for their approval and all the participants for taking part in this study.

Funding

The authors report no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Food and Nutrition Sciences, College of Health Sciences, PAAET, Showaikh, Kuwait

    Ahmad R. Al-Haifi, Balqees A. Al-Awadhi, Nayef Y. Bumaryoum & Fahhad A. Alajmi

  2. Department of Home Economics, Basic Education Collage, PAAET, Showaikh, Kuwait

    Rasha H. Ashkanani

  3. Lifestyle and Health Research Center, Health Sciences Research Center, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Hazzaa M. Al-Hazzaa

Authors
  1. Ahmad R. Al-Haifi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Balqees A. Al-Awadhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nayef Y. Bumaryoum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fahhad A. Alajmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rasha H. Ashkanani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hazzaa M. Al-Hazzaa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ARA contributed to conception; ARA, BAA, and NYB contributed to data collection; HMA contributed to interpretation of data; ARA, BAA, NYB, RHA, FAA, and HMA contributed to writing the article; all authors critically read, revised the draft for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the manuscript to be published, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad R. Al-Haifi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the College of Health Sciences in Kuwait.

Consent for publication

I, Dr. Ahmad Al-Haifi, give my consent for the above manuscript entitled “The association between academic performance indicators and lifestyle behaviors among Kuwaiti college students.” to be published in the Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Supplementary files: Table S1.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Haifi, A.R., Al-Awadhi, B.A., Bumaryoum, N.Y. et al. The association between academic performance indicators and lifestyle behaviors among Kuwaiti college students. J Health Popul Nutr 42, 27 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-023-00370-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-023-00370-w

Keywords

Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition

ISSN: 2072-1315

Contact us