Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Comparative study of exclusive breastfeeding practice among employed mothers and housewives in Tanzania

Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition volume 42, Article number: 72 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) is a global concern as it is associated with infant protection against gastrointestinal infections, reduces newborn mortality and prevents a child from becoming overweight or obese. Even though some studies have reported high EBF practices among housewives compared to employed mothers, the influences of practices among the two groups are little documented.

Objectives

The study aimed at comparing the EBF among employed mothers and housewives in Tanzania.

Methodology

The study was a facility-based comparative cross-sectional study, with a sample size of 246 mothers of children less than 6 months. Convenience sampling was used to select participants. Data were collected by using a validated questionnaire and analyzed by Statistical Package for Social Science, version 23, through descriptive statistics (frequency, proportion and mean) and inferential statistics (Chi-square test (χ2) and binary logistic regression).

Results

The findings show that 106 (80.9%) of housewives had good EBF compared to 78 (67.8%) employed mothers, which was a significant difference (χ2 = 5.57; P = 0.019). One hundred and seven (81.7%) housewives had adequate knowledge of EBF compared to 84 (73%) employed mothers, but the knowledge between them was not significantly different (χ2 = 2.63; P = 0.071). For employed mothers, only age was significantly associated with EBF (χ2 = 39.49; P = 0.006), while for housewives, none of the sociodemographic characteristics was significantly associated with EBF.

Conclusion

EBF practice was higher among housewives as compared to employed mothers. Age was significantly associated with good practice of EBF among employed mothers. The effort should be strengthened to help employed mothers aged below 28 years to practice EBF. Different programs and approaches that are developed and implemented should target this age group to increase the rate of EBF.

Introduction

Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) is a global concern as it is associated with infant protection against gastrointestinal infections, reduces newborn mortality and prevents a child from becoming overweight or obese [1]. Globally, the rate of EBF is 43%, while in sub-Saharan Africa it IS 31% and in East Africa is 42% [2]. The trend from 2012 to 2018 shows an increment of EBF for under six children in different continents; in Africa, EBF increased by 8.6%, in America by 7.3%, Europe by 6.4% and South East Asia regions by 11.0% [3]. Furthermore, in low-income countries, EBF increased by 7.1%, in middle-income countries EBF increased by 10.9% and in upper-income countries, EBF increased by 24.1% [3].

EBF refers to when infants are not given any other foods or liquid apart from the breast milk of the mother for about the first six months after delivery [4]. Exclusive breastfeeding is important for infant because breast milk contains all nutrients required for the good growth of an infant and contains antibodies to prevent disease, protecting babies from diarrhea and acute respiratory infections [5]. Moreover, breast milk is cost-effective, reduces child malnutrition and stimulates an infant’s immune system and response to vaccination to lower the risk of infections [6].

Even though there are several reported EBF hindrances such as fear of infants becoming addicted to breast milk, lack of support from husbands, non-approval from family members, maternal or infant lack of strength due to inadequate nutrition, and lack of capacity to store human milk, unfavorable work conditions are mentioned among barriers [7]. It has been recommended by Jiawen Chen that if the workplace is near home, work schedules are flexible and workplace policies support the breastfeeding environment, the rate of EBF is likely to increase [8]. Several studies have been previously carried out to compare EBF for employed and unemployed mothers; for instance, the EBF practice in Ethiopia was 54.8% for employed mothers and 73% for unemployed [9], while in Ghana, the EBF was 16% for employed and 84% for unemployed [10], and in Somali, the EBF was 24.8% for employed and 82.9% for unemployed mothers [11]. Studies indicate that employed mothers have poor EBF practices compared to unemployed.

The number of women entering the labor force has increased and making women represent a larger workforce than ever before; however, their work has become a strong barrier for EBF [12]. With this factor, different approaches have been implemented to counteract the barrier, such as policies for maternity mandates, worksite lactation spaces, breast milk extraction breaks and supportive organizational policies [12]. The global strategy for infant and young child feeding aims to raise EBF awareness, create an environment for EBF and increase the commitment of governments, international organizations and other concerned parties to promoting EBF [13]. What has been a current change in EBF of employed mothers based on the implementation of new approaches and comparison with housewives?

In Tanzania, exclusive breastfeeding practices are improving based on demographic and health indicators, showing that for 25 years exclusive breastfeeding practices have increased from 26% in 1991–1992 to 41% in 2004–2005, to 50% in 2010 and 59% in 2015–2016 [14]. However, mothers’ occupation remains a factor determining EBF practice [15]. For instance, 50.6% of females are currently employed in Tanzania [16], with more females in human health and social work activities industry 10.8%, and more female employed in agriculture, forest and fishing industry 41.1% [17]. It is reported that the rate of employed mothers rose from 67% in 2000 to 80% in 2019, which is above the average of 63% for sub-Saharan Africa, and among the highest on the continent [18]. The more women are employed, the more effects are likely to manifest in EBF practices. Unemployed mothers in Tanzania having shown the good practices of EBF are encountering some challenges, such as mothers’ workloads and time away from infants and breast milk insufficiency [19].

For mitigating the poor practices of EBF, the government of Tanzania established three favorable laws targeting the improvement of EBF among employed mothers, for instance, (i) maternity leave (Labor Act, Art. 33): An employee is entitled to at least 84 days (12 weeks) of a paid maternity leave or 100 days if an employee gives birth to multiple infants at one time; (ii) breastfeeding leave (Labor Act, Art. 33): An employer is obligated to allow a female employee to breastfeed her infant and or child during her allotted working time, for up to a maximum of 2 h during her working days; and (iii) women’s work-while pregnant or breastfeeding (Labor Act, Art 33 & 20): Employers shall not/are not permitted to have an employee who is pregnant or nursing carry out or complete task work which is hazardous to the health of her unborn or nursing child or her health [20]. Furthermore, Tanzania has introduced three EBF policies for the population and at the hospital, including exclusive breastfeeding education, complementary food education and community health worker home visits [21]. The studies assessing changes in EBF after the introduction of EBF’s laws and policies are limited. Little is documented regarding the EBF comparison of housewives and employed mothers. Even though some studies have reported high exclusive breastfeeding practices among housewives compared to employed mothers, the influences of practices among the two groups are little documented [22]. Therefore, the study aimed at comparing the EBF among employed mothers and housewives in Tanzania. Three specific objectives are ① to compare the proportion of employed and housewife practices in EBF; ② to compare exclusive breastfeeding knowledge level among employed mothers and housewives; and ③ to determine the association of sociodemographics with exclusive breastfeeding practices among employed mothers and housewives.

Methods

Study area

The study was conducted in Dodoma, a region located in central Tanzania [23]. Dodoma municipal is one among seven districts in the Dodoma region; others are Chamwino, Kongwa, Mpwapwa, Bahi, Chemba and Kondoa districts [24]. The study was conducted in Dodoma because the previous data show that Dodoma region has high rates of child stunting (37.2%), low birth weight (3.7%) and underweight (17.8%) [25]. The Tanzania healthcare system is structured in hierarch in both private and public sectors, from the grassroots level of dispensaries and health centers at village and ward level, followed by district hospitals, regional referral hospitals and zonal and national hospital at highest national level [26]. In Dodoma municipal, there are 70 healthcare facilities: five hospitals (three—public and two—private), 13 health centers (eight—public and five—private) and 52 dispensaries (36—public and 16—private) [27]. Since the study was facility based, Makole health center was selected to be the study setting of this study. Makole health center is a public municipal healthcare facility catering to most of the population in the municipal, and a famous health facility for maternal healthcare services [28].

Study design

It is a cross-sectional survey to compare the EBF among employed mothers and housewives in Tanzania.

Study population

The study has two populations: mothers of children aged less than six months and housewives with children aged less than six months.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The study included employed mothers with children aged less than six months, who attended clinics and who worked for other persons who control what is to be done and how the job is performed. Meanwhile, it included housewives with children aged less than six months who attended clinics and who stayed at home to cook, clean, take care of the children, etc., while their husbands or partners go out to work. Women were excluded from the study if they had serious sickness to impede their response, comprehension or attention in filling out the questionnaire. Moreover, they were excluded if they were unwilling to participate in the study.

Sample size and sampling technique

The sample size was computed through G*Power version 3.1.9.4, with Chi-square statistical test. The effect size was 0.3, and the Power was 96%. The sample size of participants included in the study was 246 employed mothers and housewives. Simple random sampling was used in this study, where participants were selected randomly through a lottery method. Out of 70 healthcare facilities within Dodoma municipal, Makole health center was purposively selected because of its known optimal maternal healthcare services.

Data collection and data collection tools

Data were collected by a researcher from May 13 to June 10, 2022, through a structured self-administered questionnaire. For women who were unable to read or write, the interviewer-administered questionnaire was used. The questionnaire was adopted from Cheko [2]. Later, it was modified to match the study objectives. Through a pilot test finding, the questionnaire was validated and the final version had three parts: (1) sociodemographic data of participants, (2) exclusive breastfeeding practices and (3) knowledge of exclusive breastfeeding practice.

Data analysis plan

Data were entered and analyzed in Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS), version 23. Descriptive analysis was performed for the sociodemographic characteristics (age, occupation, education, religion, gravidity and others). Categorical variables were analyzed through frequencies and percentages, while continuous data were analyzed using means. Chi-square was used to determine the association between sociodemographic characteristics and exclusive breastfeeding practice. The binary logistic regression was performed to determine the extent to which sociodemographic factors were associated with the EBF. Data were considered significant, only if the P value was less than 0.05.

Variable definitions

Employed mothers are women who worked for other persons who control what is to be done and how the job is performed, while housewives are women who stayed at home to cook, clean, take care of the children, etc., but their husbands or partners go out to work.

Variables and variables measurements

This study has independent and dependent variables, whereby maternal data (gravidity, type of delivery and place of delivery) and sociodemographic characteristics (age, marital status. occupation and education level) are categorized into the independent variables. The dependent variable was EBF practice and knowledge among mothers with children less than 6 months old. For measurements of sociodemographic data, the categorical variables were summed in the form of frequencies and percentages, while the continuous variables were in means and standard deviation. For measurement of EBF practices, six questions were used to assess the EBF practices, whereby every correct answer was given a score of one, and incorrect answers were given a zero score. Mothers who scored three or more of the total questions were considered to have a good practice of EBF, and those who scored below three points were considered to have a poor practice of EBF. For measurement of the knowledge level of EBF, 12 questions were used to determine the knowledge level. The correct answer per each question was awarded a score of one, and the incorrect was given a zero score. Mothers who scored six points and above were considered to have adequate knowledge about EBF, and those who scored below six points were considered to have inadequate knowledge.

Ethical consideration

The ethical clearance has obtained from the University of Dodoma Institution Research Review Committee (UDOM-IRREC). The committee revealed that the study had no potential harm to respondents. Informed consent was obtained from each respondent before the commencement of the study. The confidentiality of participants' data was maintained by restricting participants from disclosing their actual names; rather, codes were used. Participants were free to participate or withdraw from the study anytime they felt to do so.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics of respondents

In this study, 115 (46.7%) were employed mothers and 131 (53.3%) were housewives. The average age of both housewives and employed mothers was 28 (18–41) years, with a standard deviation of 5.7. Most of the participants 123 (50%) had a secondary education level. Moreover, for both employed mothers and housewives, the majority were married 139 (56.5%), Christian 136 (55.3%), multipara 163 (66.3%), delivered at the health facility 171 (69.5%) and delivered by spontaneous vaginal 196 (79.7%) (refer to Table 1). In comparing the sociodemographic of employed mothers and housewives, most employed mothers (53.9%) had secondary school education than their counterparts (χ2 = 39.64; P < 0.001). The majority of housewives (65.6%) were married compared to 46.1% of employed mothers (χ2 = 20.26; P < 0.001). Meanwhile, most housewives (85.5%) had undergone normal spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) compared to 73% of employed mothers (χ2 = 5.86; P = 0.18) (refer to Table 2).

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of both housewives and employed mothers (n = 246)
Full size table
Table 2 Comparison of sociodemographic characteristics of housewives and employed mothers
Full size table

EBF practices among employed mothers and housewives

In item analysis, most housewives 92 (70.2%) initiated EBF within 1 h after delivery, 107 (81.7%) gave their babies colostrum and 105 (80.2%) breastfed babies more than eight times per day. For employed mothers, 69 (60.0%) initiated EBF within 1 h after delivery, 73 (63.5%) gave their babies colostrum and 90 (78.3%) exclusively breastfed the baby for 6 months and above. Generally, most of the housewives 106 (80.9%) practice exclusive breastfeeding practice than employed mothers 78 (67.8%) (refer to Table 3). Through a cross-tabulation, the Chi-square test (χ2) was performed to compare the EBF practices between housewives and employed mothers. The findings show that 106 (80.9%) of housewives had good EBF compared to 78 (67.8%) employed mothers, which indicates a significant difference in EBF between employed mothers and housewives (χ2 = 5.57; P = 0.019) (refer to Table 4).

Table 3 EBF practices among employed mothers and housewives
Full size table
Table 4 EBF practices among employed mothers and housewives
Full size table

Comparing EBF knowledge level between employed mothers and housewives

In item analysis, most of the housewives, 98 (74.8%) had heard about EBF, 101 (77.1%) knew the EBF importance, 101 (77.1%) understood that breast milk alone can sustain a baby for 6 months, 100 (76.35%) knew that a baby should be exclusively breastfed and 97 (74.0%) knew that semi-solid food should be introduced at 6 months. For employed mothers, 76 (66.1%) heard about EBF, 74 (64.3%) knew the EBF importance, 76 (66.1%) knew that breast milk only can sustain a baby for 6 months and 76 (66.1%) knew semi-solid food should be introduced at 6 months (refer to Table 5). Through a cross-tabulation, 107 (81.7%) housewives had adequate knowledge of EBF compared to 84 (73%) employed mothers, but the knowledge between them was not significantly different (χ2 = 2.63; P = 0.071) (refer to Table 6).

Table 5 Knowledge on exclusive breastfeeding among employed mothers and housewives
Full size table
Table 6 Comparing knowledge level of EBF between employed mothers and housewives
Full size table

Association of sociodemographic characteristics with EBF among employed mothers and housewives

For employed mothers, age was significantly associated with EBF (χ2 = 39.49; P = 0.006), while other sociodemographic characteristics were not associated with EBF. For housewives, none of the sociodemographic characteristics was significantly associated with EBF (refer to Table 7). The binary logistic regression was performed to determine the extent to which the age of employed mothers was associated with EBF. It was found that employed mothers aged 28 years were 2.1 (OR) times more likely to practice EBF, P < 0.001. Meanwhile, in comparing sociodemographic characteristics between groups (employed mothers and housewives), it shows that there were significant age differences (χ2 = 4.902; P < 0.001), occupation (χ2 = 5.566; P = 0.018) and gravidity (χ2 = 4.837; P = 0.028) (refer to Table 8).

Table 7 Association of sociodemographics with EBF practices among employed mothers and housewives
Full size table
Table 8 Factors associated with EBF practice among employed mothers and housewives
Full size table

Discussion

The proportion of employed and housewives who practice exclusive breastfeeding

The study shows a high proportion of housewives 80.9% practicing EBF than employed mothers 67.8%. The findings are almost consistent with the previous study's reported EBF of 73% for unemployed mothers and 54.8% for employed mothers [9]. Furthermore, a high proportion of EBF was observed among non-working women (75.5%) compared to working women 26.5% [29]. Therefore, the study finding from the current study conforms to the previous findings that housewives or non-employed mothers have a high proportion of EBF practices than their counterparts.

Comparison of the knowledge level of EBF among employed mothers and housewives

The study shows a high proportion of 81.7% of housewives with adequate knowledge of EBF than employed mothers 73%, but not significantly different (P = 0.071). The reason for the non-significant difference might be since both women regardless of their occupation receive similar knowledge when visiting reproductive child health for maternal visits. The findings are consistent with the study carried out in Ethiopia, showing high proportion (81.4%) of housewives had knowledge about EBF than employed mothers (80.1%), without a statistical difference [2].

Association of sociodemographics with EBF practices among employed mothers and housewives

It was found that the age of employed mothers was associated with EBF, especially those aged 28 years. This could be the reason that women 28 years old are adults who have good cognitive ability, especially they abstractly think about the importance of EBF. Moreover, women aged 28 years might have positive health beliefs about EBF, especially believing in risk susceptibility to their children that lead to the practice of EBF.

Study limitation

A purposive selection of Makole health center as a study setting out of 69 healthcare facilities might have affected the findings. Moreover, the use of non-probability sampling of participants especially convenience sampling might have affected the statistical test results. The study assessed fewer sociodemographic characteristics and maternal factors, which indicates that some of the variables left unstudied could have a significant influence on EBF.

Conclusion

EBF practice was higher among housewives as compared to employed mothers. Age was significantly associated with good practice of EBF among employed mothers. The effort should be strengthened to help employed mothers aged below 28 years to practice EBF. Different programs and approaches that are developed and implemented should target this age group to increase the rate of EBF.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets of the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Point of contact: Dr. Joanes Faustine Mboineki, email: 624639045@qq.com or joanesmboineki@gmail.com, mobile number: + 255756310634.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Infant and young child feeding [Internet]. World Health Organization. 2021 [cited 2023 Jan 31]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infant-and-young-child-feeding

  2. Chekol DA, Biks GA, Gelaw YA, Melsew YA. Exclusive breastfeeding and mothers ’ employment status in Gondar town, Northwest Ethiopia : a comparative cross- sectional study. 2017;1–9.

  3. Wu H, Zhao M, Magnussen CG, Xi B. EClinicalMedicine Global prevalence of WHO infant feeding practices in 57 LMICs in 2010 À 2018 and time trends since 2000 for 44 LMICs. 2021;37:1–9.

  4. Seidu A, Ameyaw EK, Ahinkorah BO, Bonsu F. Determinants of early initiation of breastfeeding in Ghana: a population-based cross-sectional study using the. Demograph Health Surv Data. 2014;2020:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jahanpour O, Msuya SE, Todd J, Stray-pedersen B, Mgongo M. Increasing trend of exclusive breastfeeding over 12 years period (2002–2014) among women in Moshi. Tanzania BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tewabe T, Mandesh A, Gualu T, Alem G, Mekuria G, Zeleke H. Exclusive breastfeeding practice and associated factors among mothers in Motta town , East Gojjam zone , Amhara Regional State , Ethiopia , 2015 : a cross-sectional study. 2017;1–7.

  7. Amoo TB, Popoola T, Lucas R. Promoting the practice of exclusive breastfeeding: a philosophic scoping review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(380):1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen J, Xin T, Gaoshan J, Li Q, Zou K, Tan S, et al. The association between work related factors and breastfeeding practices among Chinese working mothers: a mixed-method approach. Int Breastfeed J. 2019;14(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zewdie A, Taye T, Kasahun AW, Oumer A. Effect of maternal employment on exclusive breastfeeding practice among mothers of infants 6–12 months old in Wolkite town, Ethiopia: a comparative cross-sectional study. BMC Women’s Health. 2022;22(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nkrumah J. Maternal work and exclusive breastfeeding practice: a community based cross-sectional study in Efutu Municipal. Ghana Int Breastfeed J. 2017;12(1):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tadesse F, Alemayehu Y, Shine S, Asresahegn H, Tadesse T. Exclusive breastfeeding and maternal employment among mothers of infants from three to five months old in the Fafan zone, Somali regional state of Ethiopia: a comparative cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1015.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Vilar-Compte M, Pérez-Escamilla R, Ruano AL. Interventions and policy approaches to promote equity in breastfeeding. Int J Equity Health. 2022;21(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. World Health Orangization. Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. Geneva: World Health; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tanzania Ministry of Health Community Development Gender Elderly and Children (MoHCDGEC), Zanzibar Ministry of Health, National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), Office of the Chief Government Statistician (OCGS), ICF. Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey and Malaria Indicator Survey (TDHS-MIS) 2015–2016. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: MoHCDGEC, MoH, NBS, OCGS, and ICF. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; 2016.

  15. Jahanpour OF, Okango EL, Todd J, Mwambi H, Mahande MJ. Role of clusters in exclusive breastfeeding practices in Tanzania: a secondary analysis study using demographic and health survey data (2015/2016). Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2022;10.

  16. International Finance Corporation. Tanzania Gender and Economic Growth Assessment. USA; 2007.

  17. NBS. Formal Sector Employment and Earnings Survey, 2017 Tanzania Mainland. National Bureau of Statistics, United Republic of Tanzania. Dodoma; 2017.

  18. The World Bank. Tanzania Has Much to Gain by Expanding Women’s Access to Opportunities [Internet]. The World Bank. 2022 [cited 2023 Jun 11]. Available from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2022/03/01/tanzania-has-much-to-gain-by-expanding-women-s-access-to-opportunities#:~:text=The female labor-force participation,the highest on the continent.

  19. Matare CR, Craig HC, Martin SL, Rosemary A, Chapleau GM, Kerr RB, et al. Barriers and opportunities for improved exclusive breastfeeding practices in Tanzania: household trials with mothers and fathers. Food Nutr Bull. 2019;40(3):308–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Thompson T. Complexity of Breastfeeding Health Policy in Tanzania, Africa. Wright State University: Wright State University Core Scholar; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Skiff K, deValpine M, Knopp A. Improving breastfeeding in rural Tanzania using eight-step policy analysis methodology. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2020;21(4):213–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Duwadi S, Upadhyay HP, Duwadi S, Upadhyay HP. A comparative study of exclusive breastfeeding practices among working and non-working women in Bharatpur-Tandi, Chitwan, Nepal Study design. Nepalese Journal of Statistics. 2018;2:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Security F, Development L, Office P, Government L. United Republic of Tanzania NATIONAL SAMPLE CENSUS. 2006;VIII(September).

  24. Council D, Ward B, Ward P, Ward B, Ward H, Ward K. Table 01 : Population Distribution of Dodoma Region by District , Ward and Village/Mtaa ; 2012 PHC Table 01 : Population Distribution of Dodoma Region by District , Ward and Village/Mtaa ; 2012 PHC. 2012;

  25. Ministry of Health, Community Development Gender Elderly and Children (MoHCDGEC) [Tanzania Mainland], Ministry of Health (MoH) [Zanzibar], Tanzania Food and Nutrition Centre (TFNC), National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), Office of the Chief Government Statistician (OCGS) [Zanzibar], et al. Tanzania National Nutrition Survey using SMART Methodology (TNNS) 2018. United Republic of Tanzania. Dar es Salaam; 2018.

  26. Steven Lee Mwaseba, Emmanuel Mwang’onda, Mafuru Solomi. Patient’s Perception on Factors for Choice of Healthcare Delivery at Public Hospitals in Dodoma City. Central African Journal of Public Health. 2018;4(3):76–80.

  27. Tanzania Travel Guide. Dodoma Health and Health care [Internet]. Tanzania Travel Guide. 2027. Available from: https://www.bramwelsafaris.com/dodoma-health-and-health-care/

  28. Bitwale Niyonziza Zipporah. Prevalence and factors associated with virological treatment failure among children and adolescents on antiretroviral therapy attending care and treatment clinic in Dodoma municipal. The University of Dodoma: University of Dodoma Institutional Repository; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Khan AS, Shahid S, Riaz A, Ahmed B, Ahad AH, Mustehsan ZH. Factors preventing exclusive breastfeeding among working and non-working women. Pakistan J Med Health Sci. 2021;15(3):1173–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to give thanks to the School of Nursing and Public Health for encouragement and support. The authors acknowledge the support from the University of Dodoma Institution Research Review Committee (IRREC). The authors extend the appreciation to all individual support received during the research process.

Funding

The authors received no research fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nursing Management and Education, School of Nursing and Public Health, The University of Dodoma, P. O. Box 259, Dodoma, Tanzania

    Oscar D. Ngao & Joanes Faustine Mboineki

Authors
  1. Oscar D. Ngao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joanes Faustine Mboineki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ODN developed the research protocol, collected and analyzed data and prepared the manuscript, while JFM supervised the research process, validated the research tools, recommended the proper analytical approach and revised the manuscript draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanes Faustine Mboineki.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance letter was obtained from the University of Dodoma Institution Research Review Committee (IRREC). The permission letter to conduct the study at the particular schools was provided by the Dodoma City Executive Director. Each participants completed the consent form before data collection. There is no informed consent completed by legal guardians because all participants were aged 18 years and above. Participants’ confidentiality was maintained by avoiding using their names. Participants were free to participants and withdraw from the study at any time they felt to do so. We are confirming that all described methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare to have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ngao, O.D., Mboineki, J.F. Comparative study of exclusive breastfeeding practice among employed mothers and housewives in Tanzania. J Health Popul Nutr 42, 72 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-023-00407-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-023-00407-0

Keywords

  • Exclusive breast feeding
  • Housewives
  • Employed mothers
  • Knowledge
  • Sociodemographic characteristics

Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition

ISSN: 2072-1315

Contact us