Skip to main content

Maternal–child consumption of ultra-processed foods and sugar-sweetened beverages in informal settlements in Mumbai, India

Abstract

Background

The global nutrition transition is associated with increased consumption of ultra-processed snack foods and sugar-sweetened beverages (UPF/SSB), contributing to the double burden of child obesity and undernutrition.

Methods

This cross-sectional study describes the prevalence of maternal and child UPF/SSB consumption and the factors associated with frequent consumption in a convenience sample of 749 children ages 6 months through 6 years and their mothers participating in a community-based child oral health program in five informal settlement communities in Mumbai, India. Mothers were interviewed regarding maternal and child oral health and nutrition characteristics, including consumption of beverages and foods associated with tooth decay—milk, soda, tea with sugar, sweets, and chips/biscuits—using standardized questionnaires. Spearman correlations were used to assess for associations between various social factors and the frequency of maternal and child consumption of the five food categories. Chi-square tests were used to assess differences in child consumption patterns by age groups.

Results

Though reported soda consumption was low among both mothers and children, nearly 60% of children consumed sweets and chips/biscuits daily, four to five times the rate of mothers. Factors associated with children’s frequent consumption of UPF/SSB included lower maternal education level, frequent maternal consumption of UPF/SSB, greater number of household members, greater amount of money given to the child, and closer proximity to a store.

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrate social factors that may promote UPF/SSB consumption. The nutritional dangers of sugary drinks and non-nutritious snacks for mothers and young children should be addressed across maternal–child health, education, and social service programs. Early childhood nutrition interventions should involve the entire family and community and emphasize the need to limit children’s consumption of unhealthy foods and beverages from an early age.

Background

Over recent decades, trade liberalization, globalization, and widespread marketing of ultra-processed sugary beverages and snack foods have driven a global nutrition transition [1,2,3,4,5,6]. In India, snack food and beverage companies have sponsored sports and cultural competitions, and used social media, television, and celebrities to promote their products to young consumers [7]. From the 1970s to the early 2000s, India experienced increased availability and affordability of unhealthy foods, and this trend is expected to continue [1, 4]. As such, India, as well as most low- and middle-income countries, has experienced dramatic shifts in dietary practices from traditional breastfeeding and home-cooked meals to bottlefeeding and “Western diets” high in sugar, saturated fats, and highly processed ingredients [1, 5].

Increased consumption of non-nutritious snacks and beverages (i.e., “UPF/SSB”) [8, 9] has contributed to a “double burden of malnutrition,” with persistently high rates of undernutrition and obesity in India [10, 11]. The most recent national data on children under age five show that 38.4% experience stunting (41.2% rural, 31.0% urban), 35.8% underweight (38.3% rural, 29.1% urban) and 21.0% wasting (21.5% rural, 20.0% urban) [12]. Among school-age children, 9% are obese; and among urban South Indian adolescents aged 13–18, 18.5% of girls and 21.4% of boys are overweight or obese [13]. Moreover, during the COVID-19 pandemic, adolescent lifestyle habits were negatively impacted [14] and food insecurity and obesity prevalence were exacerbated [15], making the overconsumption of ultra-processed snack foods and sugar-sweetened beverages (UPF/SSB) an urgent concern [16]. A recent 2021 survey of Indian children from ages 9–14 reported that 93% ate packaged UPF/SSBs and 68% drank sugary beverages every week, including 53% consuming them one or more times a day [17]. Consuming UPF/SSB has been associated with increasing rates of tooth decay, child obesity, hypertension, and type II diabetes, especially among children in higher-income families [16, 18,19,20]. These consumption patterns have also been associated with undernutrition and vitamin deficiencies in children from low-income families by providing excess calories while lacking important micronutrients [21, 22]. Since many therapeutics to treat these diseases are prohibitively expensive [23, 24], it is critical to understand the social determinants that contribute to disease in order to prevent them.

With the persistence of child undernutrition and increase in obesity in India, there is a need to further examine the socioeconomic, educational, behavioral, and environmental characteristics that promote young children’s consumption of UPF/SSB and identify additional strategies to improve maternal–child nutrition interventions. The objectives of this study were to examine the frequency of consumption of UPF/SSB and to identify factors associated with frequent consumption in a sample of young children and their mothers from Mumbai, India.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study of maternal and child nutrition in a convenience sample of 749 children from age six months through six years and their mothers/caregivers participating in a community-based child oral health program, India Smiles, in five low-income informal settlement communities in and around Mumbai, India. Data were collected from December 2012 to December 2014 as part of a collaboration among University of California, Berkeley (UCB) and University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) with local non-governmental non-profit organizations (NGOs) in Mumbai, India: Foundation for Mother and Child Health (FMCH), Reality Gives, and Community Outreach Programme (CORP). All three organizations provide health, nutrition, education, social service, and vocational training programs to empower low-income community members, particularly mothers and children. Study approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of UCB (#2012-11-4798) with IRB reliance from UCSF (#369-4) and from the board of directors of the partner NGOs. This research study was performed in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration.

The community health workers employed by the local NGOs invited families in the communities where they worked, with children in the designated age group, to participate in the program. The community health workers had trust with community members, substantial experience in maternal and child health and nutrition, and were well-trained to administer survey questions, obtain anthropometric measurements, and maintain confidentiality. Study personnel provided health workers with one additional day of training to administer the study survey and confirm procedures for measuring children’s length/height and weight, wearing light clothing and no shoes, with a stadiometer and digital scale (Seca, Chino, CA, USA), following WHO standards [25]. Each mother/caregiver was provided a written consent form and verbal explanation in her preferred language, and each child was provided simple verbal information for assent to participate. Trained community health workers and volunteers collected data through mother/caregiver interviews in the preferred language, with a survey of 50 questions modified from the World Health Organization (WHO) Oral Health Survey, on demographic characteristics and maternal and child oral health and nutrition, including consumption of selected beverages and foods associated with tooth decay—milk, soda, tea with sugar, sweets, and chips/biscuits (Additional file 1) [26]. This survey has been adapted and validated in studies in India [27], Vietnam [28], Nepal [29], Ecuador [30], and El Salvador [31]. Unique participant identification numbers with individual, family and site codes were assigned upon registration. Data were recorded on paper forms and manually inputted into Excel (Microsoft, Seattle, Washington), and R statistical programming software was used to merge datasets and select each child’s first visit. Data cleaning identified errors, inconsistencies, and outliers; corrected errors by utilizing data from the original hard-copy datasheets; and eliminated duplications and cases with critical missing data. The final dataset was exported to Stata SE17 (College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC) for analysis. Child nutritional status was determined using the WHO 2006 growth standards to calculate Z-scores for height for age (HAZ), body mass index for age (BAZ), and weight for age (WAZ). A low HAZ indicates stunting or chronic malnutrition, a low BAZ indicates wasting or acute malnutrition, and a low WAZ indicates underweight, which can be a combination of acute and chronic malnutrition [32]. Overweight was defined as BAZ >  + 2 but less than or equal to + 3 for children under age five, and BAZ >  + 1 but less than or equal to + 2 for children age five and older; obesity was defined by BAZ >  + 3 for children under age five, and BAZ >  + 2 for children age five and older [33,34,35].

For the descriptive analysis, we collapsed consumption patterns into binary variables, i.e., consumption “less often than daily” versus “one or more times per day.” For the association analyses, we used Spearman correlations, a nonparametric measure of the strength and direction of association between two variables measured on at least an ordinal scale, to determine the association between the ordinally reported maternal and child consumption of milk, soda, tea with sugar, sweets, and chips/biscuits; and the association between key sociodemographic factors with the ordinal frequency of maternal and child consumption of each respective food group. A descriptive analysis was completed for families’ demographic characteristics and mothers’ and children’s consumption patterns of milk (for mothers, animal milk; for children, breast milk, baby formula and animal milk), soda, tea with sugar, sweets, and chips/biscuits. Consumption of tea with sugar for both children and mothers as well as consumption of sweets for mothers was added to the standardized questionnaires in Year two. Hence, the sample sizes for these measures are smaller. Participants reported their frequency of consumption of each item on a scale from never consuming the food to having it two to three times per day. Chi-square tests were used to assess differences in child consumption by one-year age groups. For all tests, p-values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

This study involved 749 children from six months through six years old and 523 mothers/caregivers. If mothers had multiple children in this age group, they were all included in the study; specifically, 327 mothers had one child, while the other 196 had two to five children. The children’s mean age was nearly four years, and slightly more than half were male. Two-thirds of children were breastfed and not bottlefed, a quarter of children experienced mixed breast- and bottlefeeding, and 3.7% were bottlefed and not breastfed. For children who had reportedly concluded their period of breastfeeding and/or bottlefeeding (i.e., not still breastfeeding or bottlefeeding), the mean duration for breastfeeding and bottlefeeding was calculated: nearly 22 months for breastfeeding and 20 months for bottlefeeding. One in 10 children who were bottlefed drank sugary liquids in the baby bottle, including milk with sugar, tea with sugar, sugar water, soda, juice, and Horlicks (a popular, sweet, processed malted milk drink). In our study sample, there was a significant burden of chronic malnutrition with 40.1% experiencing stunting (low HAZ) and 40.7% underweight (low WAZ), with 15.6% experiencing wasting (low BAZ). Less prevalent were overweight (2.9%) and obesity (1.1%) (Table 1).

Table 1 Child, mother, and family characteristics

The mothers had a mean age of 28 years, with a mean of six years of education. They had an average of two children, with a mean of approximately six people in the household. Over one in four families gave their children ≥ 10 rupees (approximately US $0.20) daily. More than four in five families lived less than a five-minute walking distance from a store that sold UPF/SSB (Table 1).

Figure 1 displays the overall daily consumption of the specified beverages and snack foods by mothers compared to their children. Most mothers (87.8%) consumed tea with sugar daily, but only a small proportion of mothers consumed soda, sweets, or chips/biscuits daily. Children’s consumption patterns were distinct from their mothers. Overall, approximately 60% of children consumed each of the following daily: milk, tea with sugar, sweet snacks, chips/biscuits, while only 12–17% of mothers consumed these items; therefore, the percentage of children’s daily consumption of UPF/SSB was approximately four times as high as the percentage of mothers’ daily UPF/SSB consumption. The only item that was infrequently consumed was soda. Tea with sugar was the only item that mothers consumed more frequently than children. There were significant positive correlations between mothers’ and their children’s consumption pattern for both nutritious items (milk) and non-nutritious items (soda, sweets, chips/biscuits) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Maternal and Child Daily Beverage and Snack Food Consumption. *Spearman correlations for maternal and child consumption of all five food groups were statistically significant. Sample sizes varied due to missing data: child milk = 699; child soda = 721; child tea with sugar = 479; child sweets = 726; child chips or biscuits = 727; mother milk = 507; mother soda = 510; mother tea w/sugar = 336; mother sweets = 335; mother chips or biscuits = 513

We also examined the frequency of children’s consumption of the five food categories across one-year age groups. With increasing child age from birth through age six, a general trend is seen for decreasing consumption of milk and increasing consumption of tea with sugar, sweets, and chips/biscuits. Importantly, under age one, a substantial proportion of infants had daily consumption of soda (6.7%), sweets (14.3%) and chips/biscuits (33.3%); by age two, a majority of toddlers had daily consumption of tea with sugar (50.6%), sweets (60.6%), and chips/biscuits (62.6%); and from ages three to six, children maintained a similar frequency of daily consumption of sweets and chips/biscuits, with increased frequency only in daily consumption of tea with sugar (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Children’s Daily Beverage and Snack Food Consumption by Age. *Chi-square tests showed significant differences in milk, tea with sugar, sweets, and chips or biscuits consumption by 1 year age groups. ^Sample sizes varied due to missing data: milk = 699; soda = 721; tea with/ sugar = 479; sweets = 726; chips or biscuits = 727

When examining the sociodemographic factors associated with daily consumption of the specified beverages and snack foods, mothers' daily consumption of tea with sugar was positively associated with the mother’s education level and number of household members; no other associations were found (Table 2).

Table 2 Factors associated with mothers’ daily consumption of beverages and snack foods

In contrast, many sociodemographic factors were associated with children’s daily consumption of beverages and snack foods (Table 3, Fig. 3). Notably, higher maternal education was associated with less child daily consumption of tea with sugar as well as sweets and chips/biscuits. A higher total number of household members was associated with increased daily consumption of chips/biscuits. A greater amount of money given to the child was associated with greater daily consumption of soda and tea with sugar and chips/biscuits. Closer proximity to a store that sold UPF/SSB was associated with increased daily consumption of sweets. Though the child’s age was not correlated with consumption measures, chi-square tests demonstrated significant differences in milk, tea with sugar, sweets, and chips/biscuits consumption by one-year age groups (Fig. 2).

Table 3 Factors associated with children’s daily consumption of beverages and snack foods
Fig. 3
figure 3

Protective Factors and Risk Factors of Increased UPF/SSB Consumption*. *Risk and protective factors were obtained from Table 3

Discussion

This study found that in a community with a significant burden of chronic malnutrition, most young children consumed sugary beverages (particularly tea with sugar) and non-nutritious processed snack foods daily, demonstrating that ultra-processed foods and sugar-sweetened beverages have become a daily staple of young children’s diets in Mumbai informal settlements. Children’s daily consumption of UPF/SSB was approximately four times as high as the rate of mothers’ daily UPF/SSB consumption, indicating that the nutrition transition is occurring not only at a global level, but at the family level across one generation. Our findings are consistent with other studies that have found generational differences in UPF/SSB consumption within the same household [36, 37].

Snack food companies are known to target marketing to children and parents of young children [38], including assertions that chocolate, biscuits, and sugary drinks are healthy for children; make children happy, strong, and intelligent; and are a quick and inexpensive meal. This is particularly of concern as food consumption habits in childhood are likely to become lifelong dietary patterns [36]. Families with working parents, who have less time to prepare home-cooked meals, are particularly vulnerable to giving their children money to buy food, which often includes UPF/SSB [39, 40]. The finding that mothers consumed less UPF/SSB than their children may be a positive sign—those mothers valued their traditional, healthier diets. Moreover, studies show that parents help shape children’s eating preferences [41]. Nutrition education programs could build on mothers’ healthier eating habits and counter the advertising claims by emphasizing that sugary drinks and UPF/SSB interfere with children’s appetite and growth, and that children need traditional, natural, and nutritious food and beverages to optimize their growth, energy, and educational potential.

The many risk and protective factors associated with children’s frequent consumption of UPF/SSB demonstrate possible targets for intervention. A socio-ecological approach [42] can identify factors that could be addressed by interventions at maternal–child, family, community, and global levels. At the maternal–child level, the correlations between childhood UPF/SSB consumption with both mother’s UPF/SSB consumption and children’s age [43, 44] demonstrate that prenatal, postpartum and early childhood maternal–child health services should educate on the short- and long-term health hazards of eating non-nutritious snack foods and drinking sugary beverages. In the informal settlement communities included in our sample, we found that higher maternal education was associated with lower child UPF/SSB consumption, which is consistent with other studies [45, 46]. However, it appears there is a dual phenomenon in that UPF/SSB consumption and obesity are highly prevalent in affluent, well-educated families [47]. This suggests that while female empowerment and education initiatives may be helpful in low-income communities to promote socioeconomic mobility and perhaps the health status of the mother and her children, there are other factors in addition to parents’ education level that contribute to poor nutrition.

At the family level, the number of household members and money given to the child were significantly associated with children’s consumption of UPF/SSB and oral health status, underscoring the importance of extending interventions to the whole family, including grandmothers, who are traditionally key decision-makers for Indian household finances, parenting and child nutrition practices [27, 48]. At the community level, the strong association between proximity to stores and children’s UPF/SSB consumption supports findings that urbanization and global marketing have made unhealthy snack foods and beverages easily accessible in children’s environments. The Food Safety and Standard Authority of India (FSSAI) recently implemented the “Eat Right Movement “ which bans all UPF/SSBs and pre-packaged foods inside schools and within 50 m of the school campus [49]. This new movement can help limit children’s daily access to and consumption of UPF/SSB [50]. Additionally, expanding Indian regional taxes on UPF/SSB may prove successful as in Mexico [51], where increased prices of taxed beverages have led to lower sales and reduced consumption of unhealthy products [52]. Powell et al. assessed the outcomes of SSB taxes around the world and found that taxes to increase the price of sugary drinks by 20% would in turn decrease its consumption by 24% [53, 54]. Global nutrition advocates can collaborate to combat the economic infrastructure contributing to the global pandemics of malnutrition, obesity, and other non-communicable diseases. For instance, the Assessment & Research on Child Feeding (ARCH) Project’s work on the negative impacts of commercially produced foods have influenced the WHO’s guidance to end the promotion of UPF/SSBs for infants. Furthermore, advocacy by non-communicable disease and dental experts led to the development of WHO guidelines on limiting sugar intake for adults and children [55]. Additional nutrition policies and public education are needed to achieve Sustainable Development Goal 2, improving food security and nutrition.

This study is not without limitations, including convenience sampling, which may limit the generalizability of the findings; and cross-sectional design, which cannot establish causation. Our study focused on informal settlements in Mumbai. Therefore, the associations found may not be generalizable to other communities in India. In addition, dietary information was limited to self-reported measures of consumption of five food/beverage categories and did not include a complete maternal–child dietary record. Mothers may have underreported their children’s consumption of UPF/SSB to avoid judgment by the interviewer or because they were unaware of their children’s UPF/SSB consumption when unsupervised. In addition, while we explored a variety of social determinants, this list was by no means all-inclusive and there are surely other factors at play that we were unable to assess. We performed Spearman correlations to denote associations between two measures; however, this is an unadjusted relationship that does not account for potential confounders. The study’s strengths include a sizable study sample of children and mothers in low-income communities. In addition, we were able to evaluate both mothers’ and children’s consumption of UPF/SSB and sugary beverages as well as various factors associated with consumption patterns, which are often neglected in nutrition studies and interventions in developing countries.

Conclusions

This study of children from six months through six years of age and their mothers in Mumbai, India found that over half of the children consumed UPF/SSB daily. This study found several maternal–child, family and community-level factors associated with children’s consumption of UPF/SSB and identified opportunities to incorporate nutrition education and policies to limit the consumption of non-nutritious snack foods and sugary beverages through maternal–child health services, schools, social services, and governmental regulations. Future studies are needed to demonstrate whether community and family interventions designed to target these factors can reduce young children’s consumption of UPF/SSB and improve their nutritional status and educational potential.

Availability of data and materials

The original datasets analyzed in this study are not publicly available in accordance with participant privacy, informed consent forms that did not include release of the data, and the study’s approved IRB protocols. However, the minimal dataset necessary to interpret, replicate, and build upon the findings of this study is available from the senior author [KSG] upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ARCH:

Assessment & Research on Child Feeding

CORP:

Community Outreach Programme

FMCH:

Foundation for Mother and Child Health

FSSAI:

Food Safety and Standard Authority of India

IRB:

Institutional Review Board

NGOs:

Non-governmental non-profit organizations

UCB:

University of California, Berkeley

UCSF:

University of California, San Francisco

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Pries AM, Filteau S, Ferguson EL. Snack food and beverage consumption and young child nutrition in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Matern Child Nutr. 2019;15:e12729. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12729.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Levy RB, Moubarac J-C, Louzada ML, Rauber F, Khandpur N, Cediel G, Neri D, Martinez-Steele E, et al. Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them. Public Health Nutr. 2019;22:936–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980018003762.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Shetty PS. Nutrition transition in India. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5:175–82. https://doi.org/10.1079/PHN2001291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Popkin BM, Ng SW. The nutrition transition to a stage of high obesity and noncommunicable disease prevalence dominated by ultra-processed foods is not inevitable. Obes Rev. 2022;23:e13366. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Popkin BM, Corvalan C, Grummer-Strawn LM. Dynamics of the double burden of malnutrition and the changing nutrition reality. Lancet. 2020;395:65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32497-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dunford E, Popkin B. Ultra-processed food for infants and toddlers; dynamics of supply and demand. Bull World Health Organ. 2023;101:358–60. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.22.289448.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaushik JS, Narang M, Parakh A. Fast food consumption in children. Indian Pediatr. 2011;48:97–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-011-0035-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Menegassi B, De Morais Sato P, Scagliusi FB, Moubarac J-C. Comparing the ways a sample of Brazilian adults classify food with the NOVA food classification: an exploratory insight. Appetite. 2019;137:226–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.03.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Monteiro CA, Cannon G. The trouble with ultra-processed foods. BMJ. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o1972.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hemalatha R, Radhakrishna K, Kumar Bn. Undernutrition in children & critical windows of opportunity in Indian context. Indian J Med Res. 2018;148:612. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1963_18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Varghese JS, Gupta A, Mehta R, Stein AD, Patel SA. Changes in child undernutrition and overweight in India from 2006 to 2021: an ecological analysis of 36 states. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022;10:e2100569. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00569.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Government of India: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4). Mumbai, India: International Institute for Population Sciences; 2016. Available from: http://Rchiips.Org/NFHS/Pdf/NFHS4/India.Pdf.

  13. JothiRajan MA. Childhood obesity: the Indian Scenario compared with world wide. Curr Res Diabetes Obes J. 2018. https://doi.org/10.19080/CRDOJ.2018.05.555672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Karatzi K, Poulia K-A, Papakonstantinou E, Zampelas A. The impact of nutritional and lifestyle changes on body weight, body composition and cardiometabolic risk factors in children and adolescents during the pandemic of COVID-19: a systematic review. Children. 2021;8:1130. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8121130.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Pryor S, Dietz W. The COVID-19, obesity, and food insecurity syndemic. Curr Obes Rep. 2022;11:70–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-021-00462-w.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Magriplis E, Michas G, Petridi E, Chrousos GP, Roma E, Benetou V, Cholopoulos N, Micha R, Panagiotakos D, Zampelas A. Dietary sugar intake and its association with obesity in children and adolescents. Children. 2021;8:676. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8080676.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh SA, Dhanasekaran D, Ganamurali NLP, Sabarathinam S. Junk food-induced obesity- a growing threat to YOUNGSTERS during the pandemic. Obes Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obmed.2021.100364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aggarwal T, Bhatia RC, Singh D, Sobti PC. Prevalence of obesity and overweight in affluent adolescents from Ludhiana, Punjab. Indian Pediatr. 2008;45:500–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goyal RK, Shah VN, Saboo BD, Phatak SR, Shah NN, Gohel MC, Raval PB, Patel SS. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in indian adolescent school going children: its relationship with socioeconomic status and associated lifestyle factors. J Assoc Physicians India. 2010;58:151–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Petridi E, Karatzi K, Magriplis E, Charidemou E, Philippou E, Zampelas A. The impact of ultra-processed foods on obesity and cardiometabolic comorbidities in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Nutr Rev. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuad095.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Huffman SL, Piwoz EG, Vosti SA, Dewey KG. Babies, soft drinks and snacks: a concern in low- and middle-income Countries? Matern Child Nutr. 2014;10:562–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12126.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Pathak PK, Singh A. Trends in malnutrition among children in India: growing inequalities across different economic groups. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73:576–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kulchar RJ, Singh R, Ding S, Alexander E, Leong KW, Daniell H. Delivery of biologics: topical administration. Biomaterials. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Daniell H, Kulchar RJ, Herzog RW, Kulis M, Leong KW. Plant cell-based drug delivery enhances affordability of biologics. Nat Biotechnol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01899-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. WHO Child Growth Standards and the Identification of Severe Acute Malnutrition in Infants and Children. Available Online: http://www.who.Int/Nutrition/Publications/Severemalnutrition/9789241598163/En/.

  26. WHO Oral Health Surveys: Basic Methods. Available Online: https://Www.Who.Int/Oral_health/Publications/9789241548649/En/.

  27. Athavale P, Khadka N, Roy S, Mukherjee P, Chandra Mohan D, Turton (Bethy) B, Sokal-Gutierrez K. Early Childhood junk food consumption, severe dental caries, and undernutrition: a mixed-methods study from Mumbai, India. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:8629. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228629.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Khanh LN, Ivey SL, Sokal-Gutierrez K, Barkan H, Ngo KM, Hoang HT, Vuong I, Thai N. Early childhood caries, mouth pain, and nutritional threats in Vietnam. Am J Public Health. 2015;105:2510–7. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302798.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Tsang C, Sokal-Gutierrez K, Patel P, Lewis B, Huang D, Ronsin K, Baral A, Bhatta A, Khadka N, Barkan H, Gurung S. Early childhood oral health and nutrition in urban and rural Nepal. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:2456. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142456.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Sokal-Gutierrez K, Turton B, Husby H, Paz CL. Early childhood caries and malnutrition: baseline and two-year follow-up results of a community-based prevention intervention in rural Ecuador. BMC Nutr. 2016;2:73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-016-0110-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dabiri D, Fontana M, Kapila Y, Eckert G, Sokal-Gutierrez K. Community-based assessment and intervention for early childhood caries in rural El Salvador. Int Dent J. 2016;66:221–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/idj.12228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang Y, Chen H-J. Use of percentiles and Z-scores in anthropometry. In: Handbook of anthropometry. Springer, New York; 2012; p. 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1788-1_2

  33. World Health Organization; United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) Recommendations for Data Collection, Analysis and Reporting on Anthropometric Indicators in Children under 5 Years Old; World Health Organization: Geneva, 2019; ISBN 978-92-4-151555-9.

  34. De Onis M. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85:660–7. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.07.043497.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. WHO Child Growth Standards. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51:1002–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03503.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Masthi NR, Ramesh NR, Jahan A. Junk Food addiction across generations in Urban Karnataka, India. J Commun Dis. 2020;52:65–71. https://doi.org/10.24321/0019.5138.202008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. O’Connor SG, Koprowski C, Dzubur E, Leventhal AM, Huh J, Dunton GF. Differences in mothers’ and children’s dietary intake during physical and sedentary activities: an ecological momentary assessment study. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017;117:1265–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2017.02.012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Story M, French S. Food advertising and marketing directed at children and adolescents in the US. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2004;1:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-1-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Cawley J, Liu F. Maternal employment and childhood obesity: a search for mechanisms in time use data. Econ Hum Biol. 2012;10:352–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2012.04.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jabs J, Devine CM, Bisogni CA, Farrell TJ, Jastran M, Wethington E. Trying to find the quickest way: employed mothers’ constructions of time for food. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007;39:18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2006.08.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Savage JS, Fisher JO, Birch LL. Parental influence on eating behavior: conception to adolescence. J Law Med Ethics. 2007;35:22–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2007.00111.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Kilanowski JF. Breadth of the socio-ecological model. J Agromedicine. 2017;2017(1059924X):1358971. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2017.1358971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Gketsios I, Tsiampalis T, Foscolou A, Vassilakou T, Kanellopoulou A, Notara V, Antonogeorgos G, Rojas-Gil A, Kornilaki E, Lagiou A, et al. The association of junk food consumption with preadolescents’ environmental influences: a school-based epidemiological study in Greece. Children. 1891;2022:9. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9121891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Juton C, Lerin C, Homs C, Casas Esteve R, Berruezo P, Cárdenas-Fuentes G, Fíto M, Grau M, Estrada L, Gómez SF, et al. Prospective associations between maternal and child diet quality and sedentary behaviors. Nutrients. 2021;13:1713. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13051713.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Saldiva SRDM, Venancio SI, De Santana AC, Da Silva Castro AL, Escuder MML, Giugliani ERJ. The consumption of unhealthy foods by Brazilian children is influenced by their mother’s educational level. Nutr J. 2014;13:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-13-33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Damen FWM, Luning PA, Fogliano V, Steenbekkers BLPA. What influences mothers’ snack choices for their children aged 2–7? Food Qual Prefer. 2019;74:10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.12.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Feng Y, Ding L, Tang X, Wang Y, Zhou C. Association between maternal education and school-age children weight status: a study from the china health nutrition survey, 2011. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:2543. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142543.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Park AH, Kulchar RJ, Susarla SM, Turton B, Sokal-Gutierrez K. Fewer children in families associated with lower odds of early childhood caries: a sample from three countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20:2195. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032195.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Bhattacharya S, Kumar R. Banning unhealthy foods in school premises in India: its implications and future recommendations. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2020;9:2158. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_431_20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kuriakose F. Tax landscape and public health: a critical examination of “fat tax” in Kerala. India SSRN Electron J. 2016. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2872180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Batis C, Rivera JA, Popkin BM, Taillie LS. First-year evaluation of Mexico’s tax on nonessential energy-dense foods: an observational study. PLOS Med. 2016;13:e1002057. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002057.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Colchero MA, Popkin BM, Rivera JA, Ng SW. Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study. BMJ. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6704.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Powell LM, Chriqui JF, Khan T, Wada R, Chaloupka FJ. Assessing the potential effectiveness of food and beverage taxes and subsidies for improving public health: a systematic review of prices, demand and body weight outcomes: review of prices. Demand Weight Obes Rev. 2013;14:110–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Andreyeva T, Marple K, Marinello S, Moore TE, Powell LM. Outcomes following taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5:e2215276. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15276.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. World Health Organization, Nutrition for Health and Development. Guideline: Sugars Intake for Adults and Children. 2015. Available from: http://www.Ncbi.Nlm.Nih.Gov/Books/NBK285537/.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the dozens of participants on the India Smiles research team and Dr. Howard Barkan who provided invaluable guidance for data analysis and unfortunately passed away before the completion of this manuscript. Above all, we greatly appreciate the community health workers and families who work tirelessly every day for a healthier future for their children.

Funding

This project was funded by the UC Berkeley Blum Center Big Ideas, UC Berkeley Undergraduate Research Apprenticeship Program, Jewish Women’s Foundation of New York, and Global Grins (donated supplies).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AK helped develop the research question and collect data, performed the data analysis, and drafted the manuscript. KSG developed and directed the study, assisted with data collection, supervised data analysis, and co-wrote the manuscript. RJK performed statistical analysis and co-wrote the manuscript. CS assisted with supervising data analysis and editing the manuscript. NK assisted with data collection and management. PM collaborated on study design, coordinated local agency and community collaboration, and facilitated data collection. ER assisted with literature review and manuscript edits. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Sokal-Gutierrez.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Study approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of UCB (#2012–11-4798) with IRB reliance from UCSF (#369–4), and from the board of directors of the partner NGOs. All participants provided either written or oral informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Study survey.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, A., Kulchar, R.J., Khadka, N. et al. Maternal–child consumption of ultra-processed foods and sugar-sweetened beverages in informal settlements in Mumbai, India. J Health Popul Nutr 42, 142 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-023-00486-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-023-00486-z

Keywords