Skip to main content

The association between dietary acid load and body composition in physical education students aged 18–25 years

Abstract

Aim

To find the association between dietary acid load (DAL) and body composition in physical education students.

Methods

This study was carried out on 207 students of both genders aged 18–25 years. DAL was calculated based on potential renal acid load (PRAL) and net endogenous acid production (NEAP) methods. Anthropometric indices were measured. Bioelectric impedance was used to assess body composition and other related items.

Results

The mean score of NEAP and PRAL was 80.18 ± 31.30 and 33.94 ± 22.11, respectively. The mean weight and fat mass of subjects were 64.05 ± 9.72 kg and 20.28 ± 0.67 kg, respectively. Participants in the highest tertile of PRAL had a higher weight (64.56 ± 1.14 kg) in comparison with participants in the lowest tertile (61.65 ± 1.19 kg) (P = 0.027). After adjusting for confounders, a significant positive association was found between NEAP score and hip circumference (β = 0.206, P = 0.039), body mass index (β = 0.214, P = 0.031), fat mass (β = 0.218, P = 0.001) and body adiposity index (β = 0.182, P = 0.037). Furthermore, a statistically significant negative association was observed between total body water and NEAP score (β = − 0.217, P = 0.001) and the percentage of fat-free mass and NEAP (β = − 0.229, P = 0.001).

Conclusion

Individuals with a higher DAL score may have a higher weight, fat mass and hip circumference and a lower fat-free mass. In addition, there might be an association between DAL and obesity.

Introduction

Abnormal and excessive fat accumulation is a well-known contributing factor to chronic diseases such as diabetes, cancer, hypertension, and other health problems. The higher prevalence of overweight and obesity is related to health disturbances and disabilities that impose a higher financial burden on the health system [1]. The role of nutrition and diet therapy in controlling obesity is well established. Diet compositions can alter the acid–base balance [2]. Previous studies have shown that metabolic acidosis may be related to obesity. The previous evidence shows that adherence to an acidogenic diet leads to the accumulation of hydrogen ions related to weight gain [3]. The higher intake of animal-based foods, meats, and western dietary patterns leads to higher organic acid production and fatty acid oxidation, particularly in obese individuals [3]. It has been reported that western dietary patterns with a higher intake of meats, eggs and refined grains and a higher dietary acid load (DAL) may induce central obesity and metabolic syndrome [4, 5]. Li et al. demonstrated that a higher DAL is attributed to the adipogenic effects [6]. Furthermore, acidosis leads to lower protein synthesis, higher proteolysis and amino acid oxidation which causes a greater loss of muscle mass [7]. In addition, metabolic acidosis invigorates cortisol production and is related to metabolic disturbances [8]. However, the evidence from associations between DAL and anthropometric indices and body composition is inconsistent [9,10,11]. A meta-analysis has shown that DAL was associated with a higher obesity prevalence [1], and DAL reduction may help the prevention of obesity and other related disorders. Additionally, a study revealed a significant positive association between an alkalogenic diet and fat-free mass [12]. The established methods to assess the dietary acid load are net endogenous acid production (NEAP) and potential renal acid load (PRAL) [13, 14]. These scores are correlated with 24-h urinary acid load and have been validated in adults [13].

Acid–base balance is an important factor for health status and physical performance. Acids production increase with physical activity and a higher basal metabolic rate. Physical activity and sports lead to changes in the acid–base balance and produce additional organic acids in the body [15]. Therefore, more active individuals might have more organic acids in the body and metabolic disturbances. To the best of our knowledge, no study has examined associations between DAL and body composition in Physical Education students who are physically active. The present study investigates the association between DAL and body composition and anthropometric indices in physical education students aged 18–25 years. DAL was measured using NEAP and PRAL scores.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 207 healthy men and women Physical Education Faculty of Tabriz University in Tabriz, Iran, were randomly recruited between June and July 2013. The sample size for the present study was calculated by G-power software regarding the relationship between DAL and weight as the effect size of interest, considering 95% confidence and 80% power by a two-tailed test (N = 207). By random sampling method, 207 physical education students aged 18–25 years were recruited. All subjects signed the written consent form before participating in this study. The inclusion criteria included an age range of 18 to 25 years old and being a student of physical education for at least 6 months. Individuals with chronic diseases including cancers, thyroid problems, cardiovascular and kidney disease were excluded. Students who reported a total energy intake of < 800 and > 4200 kcal were excluded as the under and over reports of energy intakes [16]. The present study was carried out based on the recommendations of the ethics committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (ethical code: 5/4/2357; 11/6/2013).

Socio-demographic characteristics, including age, gender, family income, parents' occupation, homeownership, the number of essential items for living, smoking habits, medical history, and supplement consumption, were collected using a questionnaire. As a confounder, socioeconomic status (SES) was assessed using a Likert scale for each socioeconomic item, including parents' occupation and income, homeownership, and the number of essential items for living. Finally, all scores are summed up to measure the SES. Physical activity level was recorded using a self-reported questionnaire and expressed as a metabolic equivalent hours/day. The scale ranged from sleep/rest (0.9) to high-intensity physical activity (< 6) [17].

Assessment of anthropometric measures and body composition

The body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg while participants were in light clothes and without shoes using a calibrated electronic Seca scale (Seca 769, Germany). At the beginning of the day of data collection, the scale was calibrated against 100 kg weight. Height was measured in the stand position with shoulders in a normal position and without shoes, using a stadiometer to the nearest 0.1 cm (Seca 220, Germany). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight divided by height (kg/m2). Waist circumference (WC) was measured at 0.1 cm using an unstretched tape measure at the midpoint between the lower costal border and above the iliac crest at the end of normal expiration (Seca 201, Germany). Hip circumference (HC) was measured at the maximum perimeter using a non-stretchable tape to the nearest 0.1 cm (Seca 201, Germany). Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) was calculated by dividing the waist by hip size. Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) was calculated by dividing WC (cm) by height (cm). Bioelectric impedance using an auto-calibrated in body 230 (Biospace, Dogok-dong, South Korea) was used for the assessment of body composition components, including muscle mass (MM), fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM), total body water (TBW), and body adiposity index (BAI) and their percentages while participants were in light clothes. Regarding the standard conditions [18], subjects were 2-h fasting before measuring the body composition with a lack of intense activity 12 h before the test, were not in their menstrual periods, and were in light clothes. All the data collection was performed by an expert nutritionist. Also, all anthropometric indices were treated as a continuous variable.

Assessment of dietary intake

A validated semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ 168-item) was used to record participants' dietary intakes over the past year [19]. All participants filled in the frequency and amount of consumption of each food item on a daily, weekly, or monthly over the past year. The portion sizes of all reported foods were converted to grams/day using household measurements [20]. Nutritionist IV software (Version 7.0; N-Squared Computing, Salem, OR, USA) adapted for Iranian foods was used for nutrient analysis [21].

Assessment of dietary acid load (DAL)

The dietary acid load was calculated according to the potential renal acid load (PRAL) [22] and the net endogenous acid production (NEAP) methods [14].

$$\begin{aligned} & {\text{PRAL}}\left( {{\text{milliequivalents}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{acid}}\;{\text{per}}\;{\text{day}};\;{\text{mEq}}/{\text{d}}} \right) = \left( {{\text{protein}}\left[ {{\text{g}}/{\text{d}}} \right] \times 0.{49}} \right) \\ & \quad + \left( {{\text{Phosphorus}}\left[ {{\text{mg}}/{\text{d}}} \right] \times 0.0{37}} \right) {-}\left( {{\text{Potassium}}\left[ {{\text{mg}}/{\text{d}}} \right] \times 0.0{21}} \right) \\ & \quad {-}\left( {{\text{Calcium}}\left[ {{\text{mg}}/{\text{d}}} \right] \times 0.0{13}} \right){-}\left( {{\text{Magnesium}}\left[ {{\text{mg}}/{\text{d}}} \right] \times 0.0{26}} \right) \\ \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned} &{\text{Estimated NEAP}};\\ &{\text{ mEq}}/{\text{d}}\, = \,\left( {{54}.{5}\, \times \,{\text{protein intake }}\left[ {{\text{g}}/{\text{d}}} \right]/{\text{potassium intake }}\left[ {{\text{mEq}}/{\text{d}}} \right]} \right) - {1}0.{2}.\end{aligned}$$

Two scores were calculated for every participant using these two formulas (one for NEAP and one for PRAL). In the end, both scores were categorized into tertiles to have a better comparison between the lowest and the highest DAL score.

Statistical analysis

The normality distribution of variables was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. To compare participants, they were categorized into tertiles of DAL scores. Participants' characteristics were compared using ANOVA or chi-square tests against the NEAP and PRAL tertiles for continuous and categorical variables, respectively, and reported as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or percentage. Dietary intakes according to the tertiles of DAL were assessed using ANCOVA, controlling for calorie intake. Furthermore, anthropometric indices and body compositions were examined over DAL tertiles using ANCOVA in crude and adjusted models. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to examine the association between anthropometric indices (numerical) and body composition, and DAL scores. In the adjusted model, the analysis was adjusted for the confounders including age, gender, PA, SES, calorie, protein, and fat intake. Data analysis was carried out with SPSS ver.16 (Chicago, IL), and P value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

The mean score of NEAP and PRAL was 80.18 ± 31.30 and 33.94 ± 22.11, respectively. Table 1 presents the general characteristics of the participants. The mean age and weight of subjects were 21.09 years and 64.05 kg, respectively. Regarding the socioeconomic status, 22.7% of participants were poor, 54.6% were considered moderate, and 22.7% were categorized as rich. There was a statistically significant association between PA and tertiles of DAL (P < 0.0001). Also, a significant association was observed between weight and tertiles of PRAL (P = 0.045). There was no significant association between SES and tertiles of DAL. Moreover, there were no statistically significant differences between tertiles of DAL and other general characteristics.

Table 1 Characteristics of participants among tertiles of dietary acid load

Participants’ daily dietary intakes are presented in Table 2. The consumption of protein and fat was higher in the third tertile of both DAL indices (< 0.05). Intake of energy and potassium was lower in the third tertile of both DAL indices (< 0.0001). Intake of calcium and phosphorus was lower in the third tertile of both indices of DAL (< 0.0001).

Table 2 Daily dietary intakes of participants among tertiles of dietary acid load

Table 3 shows the distribution of anthropometric indices over NEAP and PRAL tertiles. Based on the results, subjects who were in the highest tertile of PRAL had a higher weight (64.56 ± 1.14 kg) in comparison with participants in the lowest tertile (61.65 ± 1.19 kg) (P = 0.027). Also, subjects in the highest tertile of NEAP had a higher hip circumference (P = 0.037) and a higher body fat (P = 0.031). Participants in the highest tertile of NEAP had a lower percentage of TBW (P = 0.03) and FFM (P = 0.018). Furthermore, there was a significant association between NEAP and BAI (P = 0.025).

Table 3 Anthropometric indices among tertiles of dietary acid load

Table 4 demonstrates the association between anthropometric indices and the score of NEAP and PRAL in the crude and adjusted models. There was a significant positive association between weight and PRAL in the crude model. However, after adjusting for confounders, this significant association disappeared. Also, there was a significant positive association between PRAL and muscle mass and TBW and FFM in the crude model; however, these significant associations disappeared after controlling for age, sex, SES, PA, and intake of energy, fat, and protein.

Table 4 Association of anthropometric indices and dietary acid load using linear regression

On the other hand, adjusting for confounders resulted in a significant positive association between the hip circumference and NEAP (β = 0.206, P = 0.039) and BMI and NEAP (β = 0.214, P = 0.031).In addition, a significant positive association between body fat and NEAP (β = 0.218, P = 0.001) and BAI and NEAP (β = 0.182, P = 0.037) was found after controlling for confounders.

A statistically significant inverse association was observed between TBW and NEAP (β = − 0.217, P = 0.001), and the percentage of FFM and NEAP (β = − 0.229, P = 0.001).

The linear regression analysis was used to examine the association between fat mass and NEAP and PRAL scores separately in men and women. Based on the results, in the adjusted model, there was no statistically significant association between fat mass and NEAP score among men (β = 0.025, P = 0.865; 95%CI − 0.058; 0.069), while there was a significant positive association between fat mass and NEAP score among women (β = 0.518, P < 0.0001; 95%CI 0.058; 0.149). Furthermore, in the adjusted model there was no statistically significant association between fat mass and PRAL score among men (β = 0.056, P = 0.759; 95%CI − 0.082; 0.112), and women (β = 0.142, P = 0.270; 95%CI − 0.035; 0.124).

In addition, the linear regression analysis was used to examine the association between fat-free mass, and NEAP and PRAL score separately in men and women. In the adjusted model, there was a positive association between fat-free mass and NEAP score among men (β = 0.292, P = 0.037; 95%CI 0.005; 0.150), while there was no significant association between fat-free mass and NEAP score among women (β = − 0.148, P = 0.292; 95%CI − 0.063; 0.019). Also, in the adjusted model, there was no statistically significant association between fat-free mass and PRAL score among men (β = 0.316, P = 0.071; 95%CI − 0.009; 0.213), and women (β = 0.074, P = 0.605; 95%CI − 0.049; 0.084).

Discussion

This cross-sectional study included 207 physical education students and found a significant positive association between a high DAL (NEAP score) and anthropometric indices, including hip circumference, BMI, fat mass, and BAI. Also, a significant inverse association was observed between a high DAL (NEAP score) and fat-free mass and TBW. There was no significant association between the PRAL score and anthropometric indices and body composition after controlling for confounders.

DAL estimates the effect of food intake on acid–base status using two NEAP and PRAL methods. A higher NEAP and PRAL score imply a higher acidity of the diet. A higher intake of dairy products and meats is related to a higher DAL, while a higher intake of vegetables and fruits is related to a lower DAL [23, 24]. Regarding NEAP and PRAL scores, the results of our study have shown a higher acidity of diet than other studies on Iranian adults [23, 25]. This difference can be justified by the higher physical activity of participants. As mentioned before, physical exercise and sports lead to a higher production of organic acids in the body [15]. Moderate and high-intensity exercise alters the acid–base balance and causes rapid muscle fatigue and metabolic changes [15, 26]. Several studies reported that the NEAP score of young individuals was about 50 mEq/day [22, 27]. However, a study found that the average NEAP score of aerobic and anaerobic athletes was slightly higher than normal individuals (53.7 vs 56.9 mEq/day) [28]. Furthermore, the average NEAP score of Lithuanian high-performance athletes was 126.1 mEq/day, which was higher than 100 mEq/day [13].

Diet plays an important key role in metabolic changes in the body. Previous studies revealed that a low-carbohydrate, high-protein diet leads to a high NEAP [28, 29]. While there was no association between carbohydrate intake and NEAP or PRAL in the present study, protein consumption was higher in the third tertile of NEAP and PRAL. Studies have revealed that excessive protein intake causes cortisol secretion and hypercortisolism which leads to proteolysis by itself [30, 31]. Although we found no significant association between muscle mass and DAL in this study, there was a significant negative association between FFM and NEAP. Also, a higher protein intake and higher DAL are associated with calcium excretion. Therefore, calcium intake is essential for prevention, particularly, in individuals with a high DAL [32]. Unfortunately, the average calcium intake in the participants of the current study was lower than the daily calcium recommendations (1202 vs. 1500 mg) [33].

Our results revealed a significant positive association between NEAP score and BMI. This finding is in line with Mozaffari et al. study [9], which found a significant positive association between NEAP and overweight and obesity (BMI > 25 kg/m2). A cross-sectional study among 375 Iranian adult women showed that DAL was directly associated with greater WC and waist-to-hip ratio [34]. Another cross-sectional study that included 5620 Iranian adults aged 20–70 years found a significant association between PRAL and a higher WC and weight [23]. However, our findings and results of a Japanese cross-sectional study that included women aged 18–22 years revealed no significant association between PRAL score and WC or obesity [35]. Other studies in adults aged 19–70 years showed a significant positive association between DAL and obesity in both genders [23, 24]. A randomized clinical trial revealed that DAL was positively correlated with changes in body weight, fat mass, and visceral fat [36]. Higher acidity and metabolic acidosis might increase proteolysis by increasing mRNA coding [37]. Also, DAL metabolic acidosis leads to impaired secretion of insulin-like growth factor 1, followed by an increase in insulin resistance [38]. Another possible explanation for the effect of DAL on anthropometric indices is the positive association between insulin resistance and serum markers of acidosis such as low bicarbonate, high anion gap and high lactate. Furthermore, it should be considered that insulin resistance increases the obesity risk. [38,39,40].

Investigating among 243 seniors revealed that DAL was negatively associated with total lean mass especially in women and probably an alkaline diet may be beneficial for preserving lean mass [41]. As mentioned previously, our findings showed an inverse association between DAL and FFM, which is in line with a cross-sectional study in women aged 18–79 years [12]. Welch et al. have indicated that more alkaline PRAL is positively associated with FFM, independent of age, physical activity, and smoking [12]. The high bicarbonate precursors in vegetables and fruits can induce metabolic alkaloids. A study on adults considered urinary potassium excretion as an indicator of intake of potassium and fruits and vegetables and reported a positive association between urinary potassium excretion and lean body mass in a study in adults [7]. Our study showed a strong significant inverse association between potassium intake and PRAL and NEAP. On the other hand, considering the high amount of sulfur-containing amino acids in the animal products, a higher intake of red meat and animal products leads to hydrogen sulfate and phosphoric acids from phospholipids and a higher DAL [11]. Most of the acidogenic diets induce proteolysis, amino acid excretion, and reduced protein synthesis cause muscle loss [7]. Different findings may be due to different ranges of DAL in various studies. Although previous studies are different in the sample size, race, gender, age, lifestyle, dietary habits, adjustments, and assessment tools, the evidence shows that DAL is related to obesity.

Although the exact mechanism of dietary acid load, which can affect body composition, is not completely known, studies revealed that protein and nutrients such as potassium and magnesium might affect body composition and anthropometric indices such as muscle mass [42, 43]. Furthermore, a higher intake of fruits and vegetables; thus, higher consumption of carotenoids and antioxidants (thereby lower DAL) may have a protective role against inflammation and oxidative stress as causes of obesity and metabolic disorders [44, 45].

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that examined the association between DAL and anthropometric indices in Physical Education students. Furthermore, individuals with comorbidities and chronic diseases were not included. However, several limitations should be considered. Firstly, the cross-sectional design cannot describe the causal effect. Secondly, using FFQ contributes to dietary misclassification. Thirdly, DAL was calculated using dietary intake estimation based on FFQ results which might under or overestimate the dietary intake. Fourthly, cortisol as an important biochemical factor related to obesity and DAL was not measured in this study. Fifthly, physical education students probably were more aware of their health and related factors, including physical activity and diet. This could be considered because these participants could have a higher level of physical activity, affecting the NEAP and PRAL scores. The body composition analysis results suggested that there is not a wide range of variation. Most of the participants are in normal categories in the present study thus, it will advance the knowledge if the comparison is made with obese individuals in future studies.

Conclusion

In the present study, individuals with a higher DAL score may have a higher weight, HC, BMI and FM. There might be an association between DAL and obesity. However, more well-designed prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Availability of data and materials

The data only will be available upon the reasonable request.

References

  1. AbbasalizadFarhangi M, Nikniaz L, Nikniaz Z. Higher dietary acid load potentially increases serum triglyceride and obesity prevalence in adults: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(5): e0216547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Remer T. Influence of diet on acid-base balance. Semin Dial. 2000;13(4):221–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berkemeyer S. Acid-base balance and weight gain: are there crucial links via protein and organic acids in understanding obesity? Med Hypotheses. 2009;73(3):347–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shang X, Li Y, Liu A, Zhang Q, Hu X, Du S, et al. Dietary pattern and its association with the prevalence of obesity and related cardiometabolic risk factors among Chinese children. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(8): e43183.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ambrosini GL, Huang RC, Mori TA, Hands BP, O’Sullivan TA, de Klerk NH, et al. Dietary patterns and markers for the metabolic syndrome in Australian adolescents. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2010;20(4):274–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Li Y, He Y, Wang D, Gao X. Association between dietary acid-based load and obesity in Chinese adults. FASEB J. 2012;26(1 supplement):8264–74.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dawson-Hughes B, Harris SS, Ceglia L. Alkaline diets favor lean tissue mass in older adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87(3):662–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maurer M, Riesen W, Muser J, Hulter HN, Krapf R. Neutralization of Western diet inhibits bone resorption independently of K intake and reduces cortisol secretion in humans. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2003;284(1):F32-40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mozaffari H, Namazi N, Larijani B, Bellissimo N, Azadbakht L. Association of dietary acid load with cardiovascular risk factors and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Iranian women: a cross-sectional study. Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif). 2019;67–68: 110570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Aslani Z, Bahreynian M, Namazi N, Shivappa N, Hébert JR, Asayesh H, et al. Association of dietary acid load with anthropometric indices in children and adolescents. Eating Weight Disorders. 2021;26(2):555–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mohammadpour S, Djafari F, Davarzani S, Djafarian K, Clark CCT, Shab-Bidar S. The association between dietary acid load and muscle strength among Iranian adults. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13(1):476.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Welch AA, MacGregor AJ, Skinner J, Spector TD, Moayyeri A, Cassidy A. A higher alkaline dietary load is associated with greater indexes of skeletal muscle mass in women. Osteoporosis Int. 2013;24(6):1899–908.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Remer T, Dimitriou T, Manz F. Dietary potential renal acid load and renal net acid excretion in healthy, free-living children and adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77(5):1255–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Frassetto LA, Todd KM, Morris RC Jr, Sebastian A. Estimation of net endogenous noncarbonic acid production in humans from diet potassium and protein contents. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;68(3):576–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Robergs RA, Ghiasvand F, Parker D. Biochemistry of exercise-induced metabolic acidosis. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2004;287(3):R502–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Saraf-Bank S, Haghighatdoost F, Esmaillzadeh A, Larijani B, Azadbakht L. Adherence to Healthy Eating Index-2010 is inversely associated with metabolic syndrome and its features among Iranian adult women. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2017;71(3):425–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Aadahl M, Jørgensen T. Validation of a new self-report instrument for measuring physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(7):1196–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sadiya A, Ahmed S, Siddieg HH, Babas IJ, Carlsson M. Effect of Ramadan fasting on metabolic markers, body composition, and dietary intake in Emiratis of Ajman (UAE) with metabolic syndrome. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome Obesity. 2011;4:409–16.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Toorang F, Sasanfar B, Esmaillzadeh A, Ebrahimpour-Koujan S, Zendehdel K. Comparison of validity of the Food Frequency Questionnaire and the Diet History Questionnaire for assessment of energy and nutrients intakes in an Iranian population. Eastern Mediterranean Health J. 2020;26(9):1062–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghaffarpour M, Houshiar-Rad A, H. K. The manual for household measures, cooking yields factors and edible portion of foods. Tehran: Nashre Olume Keshavarzy. 1999(7):213.

  21. Azadbakht L, Esmaillzadeh A. Red meat intake is associated with metabolic syndrome and the plasma C-reactive protein concentration in women. J Nutr. 2009;139(2):335–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Remer T, Manz F. Estimation of the renal net acid excretion by adults consuming diets containing variable amounts of protein. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;59(6):1356–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Khosravi H, Azizi F. Associations between dietary acid-base load and cardiometabolic risk factors in adults: the tehran lipid and glucose study. Endocrinol Metabolism (Seoul, Korea). 2015;30(2):201–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Engberink MF, Bakker SJ, Brink EJ, van Baak MA, van Rooij FJ, Hofman A, et al. Dietary acid load and risk of hypertension: the Rotterdam Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95(6):1438–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Moghadam SK, Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Tohidi M, Azizi F. Association between dietary acid load and insulin resistance: tehran lipid and glucose study. Prevent Nutrit Food Sci. 2016;21(2):104–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vilmi N, Äyrämö S, Nummela A, Pullinen T, Linnamo V. Oxygen uptake, acid-base balance and anaerobic energy system contribution in maximal 300–400 M running in child, adolescent and adult athletes. J Athl Enhanc 2016; 5:3

  27. Lemann J Jr. Relationship between urinary calcium and net acid excretion as determined by dietary protein and potassium: a review. Nephron. 1999;81(Suppl 1):18–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Baranauskas M, Jablonskienė V, Abaravičius JA. Dietary acid-base balance in high-performance Athletes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(15):5532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Berardi JM, Logan AC, Rao AV. Plant based dietary supplement increases urinary pH. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2008;5:20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Williams RS, Kozan P, Samocha-Bonet D. The role of dietary acid load and mild metabolic acidosis in insulin resistance in humans. Biochimie. 2016;124:171–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Caso G, Garlick PJ. Control of muscle protein kinetics by acid-base balance. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2005;8(1):73–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cao JJ. High dietary protein intake and protein-related acid load on bone health. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2017;15(6):571–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mountjoy M, Sundgot-Borgen J, Burke L, Carter S, Constantini N, Lebrun C, et al. The IOC consensus statement: beyond the Female Athlete Triad-Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S). Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(7):491–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mirzababaei A, Shiraseb F, Setayesh L, Tavakoli A, Daneshzad E, Abaj F, et al. The association of dietary acid load with resting metabolic rate and metabolic components in overweight and obese women: A cross sectional study. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2022;47:267–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Murakami K, Sasaki S, Takahashi Y, Uenishi K. Association between dietary acid-base load and cardiometabolic risk factors in young Japanese women. Br J Nutr. 2008;100(3):642–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kahleova H, McCann J, Alwarith J, Rembert E, Tura A, Holubkov R, et al. A plant-based diet in overweight adults in a 16-week randomized clinical trial: The role of dietary acid load. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021;44:150–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bailey JL, Wang X, England BK, Price SR, Ding X, Mitch WE. The acidosis of chronic renal failure activates muscle proteolysis in rats by augmenting transcription of genes encoding proteins of the ATP-dependent ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. J Clin Investig. 1996;97(6):1447–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Souto G, Donapetry C, Calviño J, Adeva MM. Metabolic acidosis-induced insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2011;9(4):247–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. McKeigue PM, Shah B, Marmot MG. Relation of central obesity and insulin resistance with high diabetes prevalence and cardiovascular risk in South Asians. Lancet (London, England). 1991;337(8738):382–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Crawford SO, Hoogeveen RC, Brancati FL, Astor BC, Ballantyne CM, Schmidt MI, et al. Association of blood lactate with type 2 diabetes: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Carotid MRI Study. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(6):1647–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Faure AM, Fischer K, Dawson-Hughes B, Egli A, Bischoff-Ferrari HA. Gender-specific association between dietary acid load and total lean body mass and its dependency on protein intake in seniors. Osteoporosis Int. 2017;28(12):3451–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Neville CE, Young IS, Gilchrist SE, McKinley MC, Gibson A, Edgar JD, et al. Effect of increased fruit and vegetable consumption on physical function and muscle strength in older adults. Age (Dordr). 2013;35(6):2409–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Meng X, Zhu K, Devine A, Kerr DA, Binns CW, Prince RL. A 5-year cohort study of the effects of high protein intake on lean mass and BMC in elderly postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24(11):1827–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Cesari M, Pahor M, Bartali B, Cherubini A, Penninx BW, Williams GR, et al. Antioxidants and physical performance in elderly persons: the Invecchiare in Chianti (InCHIANTI) study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79(2):289–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Mecocci P, Fanó G, Fulle S, MacGarvey U, Shinobu L, Polidori MC, et al. Age-dependent increases in oxidative damage to DNA, lipids, and proteins in human skeletal muscle. Free Radical Biol Med. 1999;26(3–4):303–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the physical education students for their participation in the study.

Funding

The Vice-Chancellor for Research of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran, financially supported this work (ID = A-192).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ED and TR designed and supervised the study. MM and BP conducted the study. ED performed the statistical analyses. MM and VB prepared a first draft of the manuscript, and ED and TR finalized it. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tohid Rouzitalab.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was carried out with the recommendation of the ethics committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (ethical code: 5/4/2357; 11/6/2013). All subjects revealed their willingness to participate in the study by written informed consent.

Consent for publication

All the authors declare that they agree to publish this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mansordehghan, M., Daneshzad, E., Basirat, V. et al. The association between dietary acid load and body composition in physical education students aged 18–25 years. J Health Popul Nutr 41, 58 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-022-00340-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-022-00340-8

Keywords